[title]Family quotes[/title] [description]Welcome to our family quotes section! Here you'll find some of the funniest (and wisest) quotes on the subject of family life![/description]
Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Thu, Oct 28 2004 10:43 AM by fab54. 5 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
fab54  +  52475 Thu, 28 Oct 04 10:43 AM
Hi!
I was reading an article about Homo sapiens and I read:
"We believe their ancestors may have reached the island using bamboo rafts."

Is the use of present perfect correct? I'd have used simple past or past perfect?
Can someone explain me?
Thanks
Joined on Tue, Jun 22 2004
New Member 46
Mister Micawber  +  52482 Thu, 28 Oct 04 11:09 AM

It can be done with the simple past-- 'We believe their ancestors reached the island using bamboo rafts.'-- but not with the past perfect.

The present perfect was chosen to stress the relevance of the fact to the present speaker (plus, of course, it allows the additional hypotheticality of 'may', which we cannot form in simple past).

California Jim may have more to say on this topic.

Joined on Wed, Aug 4 2004
Yokohama
Veteran Member 30,833
'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master-- that's all.'
fab54, 5 yr 30 days ago
Thank you Mister!!!
CalifJim  +  52627 Fri, 29 Oct 04 07:39 AM
This is not a present perfect. It is a modal construction; the modal is "may".

In this context, "may"* means "it is possible that ... [present or future]"; "may have" means "it is possible that ... [past]".

Thus, "We believe they may reach the island on a raft" is "We believe that it is possible that they will reach the island on a raft".
And "We believe they may have reached the island on a raft." is "We believe that it is possible that they reached the island on a raft".

With the modals, the only two possibilities for tense are the modal alone (making the proposition which follows non-past) and the modal followed by "have" (making the proposition which follows past).

*without the "have".

Smile [:)]
Joined on Mon, Aug 2 2004
California
Veteran Member 22,463
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
fab54, 5 yr 29 days ago
Ok, I understand, thaks Jim (Y)
Mister Micawber  +  52647 Fri, 29 Oct 04 10:03 AM

Just a matter of terminology, Jim. As you say, in meaning, 'may' is restricted in its reference to time. The modals can however, take the forms of present perfect tense, continuous aspect, passive voice -- 'may have reached', 'may be reaching', 'may be reached [by them]'.

I am not competent to speak on the origins-- did the form come before content? The chicken before the egg?

© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3616.28671. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.