Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Sun, Oct 23 2005 4:42 PM by CalifJim. 2 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Jacek From Kwidzyn (Pomesania)  +  150799 Sun, 23 Oct 05 01:38 PM
Hello,
Both of the below sentences or surely correct. Could a native speaker (or any non-native but good English speaking person) tell me when (any context)  we can use 1) and 2)? I know present perfect relates to the past and any action it describes presumably ends at the time of speaking. I would just like to feel the usage context better.

thank you in advance,
Jacek


1. With all the work I've had to do, I've not got around to ringing.

2. With all the work I had to do, I did not get  around to ringing.



Joined on Sat, Aug 20 2005
Poland
New Member 27
Mister Micawber  +  150800 Sun, 23 Oct 05 01:49 PM

Here, the present perfect brings more immediacy to the speaker's complaint.  The present perfect in the main clause also suggests more clearly that he may yet ring.  The facts the two sentences reveal are identical, however:  he did a lot of work, and he didn't ring.




Joined on Wed, Aug 4 2004
Yokohama
Veteran Member 30,507
'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master-- that's all.'
CalifJim  +  150837 Sun, 23 Oct 05 04:42 PM
Your two sentences tell the same story, but from two different points of view.
The first is a present-viewpoint sentence; the second, a past-viewpoint sentence.

At this very moment I have still not rung because I have had so much work to do during this most recent time period.  (The situation described here still exists at the moment of speaking.)
Some time ago I did not ring because I had so much work to do during that time period. (The situation described here no longer exists.  It is a situation which existed in the past.)

If we construe "some time ago" in the second sentence as "some very short time ago", it approaches the meaning of the first sentence more closely.  Exactly how long ago is not something which is specified by the past tense itself.

CJ

Joined on Mon, Aug 2 2004
California
Veteran Member 22,128
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3598.39794. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.