[title]Family quotes[/title] [description]Welcome to our family quotes section! Here you'll find some of the funniest (and wisest) quotes on the subject of family life![/description]
Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Sun, Jan 27 2008 10:44 AM by Yoong Liat. 6 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Belly  +  469204 Sun, 27 Jan 08 01:51 AM

1) are bookkeeper and accountant the same?

2) Am I right if I say:" You can avoid the risk of obsesity when you take in less food"?

3) What is the English for "the quality of the road" in this context: "If I can change one important thing about my country, I would improve the quality of the roads, there are too much potholes on the street. " Does the sentence sound OK?

4) Does this sentence sound right:" Too many people have lost their lives as well as properties in that deluge?". I wonder if there are any word which can replace "properties" here.

Joined on Mon, Feb 19 2007
Regular Member 630
Hoa Thai  +  469209 Sun, 27 Jan 08 02:54 AM
 Belly wrote:

1) are bookkeeper and accountant the same? Try this site for a detailed answer: http://www.megaessays.com/viewpaper/6407.html

2) Am I right if I say:" You can avoid the risk of obsesity when you take in less food"? In my opinion, if is better than when, and eat / consume is better than take in.

3) What is the English for "the quality of the road" in this context: "If I can could change one important things about my country, I would improve the quality of the roads, there roads - there are too much many potholes! on the street. " Does the sentence sound OK?

4) Does this sentence sound right:" Too many people have lost their lives as well as properties in that deluge?". I wonder if there are any word which can replace "properties" here. Your sentence is fine. Sorry! I cannot find a better word to replace properties with.

Joined on Mon, Oct 15 2007
Vietnam
Contributing Member 1,100
Best Regards - Hoa Thai
Yankee  +  469281 Sun, 27 Jan 08 05:51 AM
Hi Belly

Here are some additional comments.
"You can avoid the risk of obsesity when you take in less food"
Here are some alternatives:

"You can avoid becoming obese if you eat sensibly."
"You can avoid obsesity if you don't overeat."

"If I can change one important thing about my country, I would improve the quality of the roads, there are too much potholes on the street. "
Your sentence needs a few corrections (but the word 'thing' should not be made plural):
"If I could change one important thing about my country, I would improve the quality of the roads -- there are too many potholes."

Does this sentence sound right:" Too many people have lost their lives as well as properties in that deluge?"
No, your sentence is awkward.  It sounds as though only dead people lost property.  How about this instead:
"That deluge has resulted in too much loss of life and property."



Joined on Sat, Apr 15 2006
Connecticut, USA
Veteran Member 6,502
Amy "You can't depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus." - Mark Twain
Hoa Thai  +  469290 Sun, 27 Jan 08 06:20 AM
Hi,

I stand corrected. 'thing' should not be made plural. Somehow, I saw the word of floating in my head.
Belly  +  469323 Sun, 27 Jan 08 08:47 AM

 Yankee wrote:
Hi Belly

Here are some additional comments.
"You can avoid the risk of obsesity when you take in less food"
Here are some alternatives:

"You can avoid becoming obese if you eat sensibly."
"You can avoid obsesity if you don't overeat."

"If I can change one important thing about my country, I would improve the quality of the roads, there are too much potholes on the street. "
Your sentence needs a few corrections (but the word 'thing' should not be made plural):
"If I could change one important thing about my country, I would improve the quality of the roads -- there are too many potholes."

Does this sentence sound right:" Too many people have lost their lives as well as properties in that deluge?"
No, your sentence is awkward.  It sounds as though only dead people lost property.  How about this instead:
"That deluge has resulted in too much loss of life and property."



Hi and thanks both Hoa Thai and Yankee,

Those typos I made in sentence II was because I was on the run at the time so I couldn't check but thanks you all.

By the way, Yankee, I need something to ask: Is life and property here uncountable? Property I know the reason why but how about life?

And for Hoa Thai, what are the differences between using - and , ?

Hoa Thai  +  469351 Sun, 27 Jan 08 10:43 AM
 Belly wrote:

And for Hoa Thai, what are the differences between using - and , ?


Hi Belly,

You had a problem with a comma splice, which is a sentence in which two independent clauses are joined by a comma with no conjunction.

Often at the end of a well-formed sentence, we provide a period (full stop) for pausing. However, to signal our readers that the following words still carry some residual thought, we must provide a punctuation mark that is neither the comma nor the full stop - the hyphen does the trick.

Yoong Liat, 1 yr 302 days ago
One of the typos is 'obesity'.
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3615.39139. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.