Structure of imperative sentances

   Share on Facebook  
Anonymous  #345078  Thu, 29 Mar 07 08:40 PM

I'm taking a Linguistics class in college, and I'm having a lot of trouble with this one subject, and the Professor isn't any help.

We're talking about the hypotheses about the structure of imperative sentances- with

VP hypothesis- imperative sentaces arent sentances, but VPs lacking a subject

Sentential hypothesis- imperative sentances contain a phonologically null subject that is syntactically second person

I don't understand how you would go about testing these hypotheses, which I probably will have to do on a quiz.

Any help would be great.

  
Mister Micawber  #345284  Fri, 30 Mar 07 11:53 AM

The only cogent point I can think of is that we occasionally do include the Subject (2nd person) in imperative utterances:

You get out of here, now!  You just get on your horse and ride out of town.

  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Wed, Aug 4 2004
Yokohama
Veteran Member (22,688)
SystemAdministratorTeachers
'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master-- that's all.'
CalifJim  #347648  Fri, 06 Apr 07 01:59 AM
The evidence that imperatives are not VP's lacking a subject (but contain a null subject) comes from imperatives with reflexive pronouns.  Here's how the argument goes.

yourself is only used in a clause whose subject is you:

You are washing yourself.
You are keeping this for yourself.
*He is washing yourself.

So you must be the subject of these imperatives

Wash yourself.
Keep this for yourself.


even though it's not said.

CJ



  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Mon, Aug 2 2004
California
Veteran Member (17,790)
ModeratorProficient Speaker
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL Linguistics Discussion Forum
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions & Terms of Service