BelieverI think 2nd conditionals encompass those 1) that are hypothetical yet
possible and 2) that are unreal (thus impossible to be realized in
reality).
No. The traditional divisiion into the three conditional patterns is as follows:
1. If [present], (then) ... will ... REAL
2. If [past*], (then) ... would ... UNREAL
3. If [past perfect], (then) ... would have ... UNREAL, COUNTERFACTUAL
*The past is sometimes called the past subjunctive in this position. Only the verb to be has a special form (were in all persons and numbers) in this position.
Other
combinations of tenses in these kinds of if patterns have no numeric
designators (like fourth, fifth, or sixth conditional) except
occasionally in specific textbooks which invent their own methods and
terms for teaching purposes. Some writers consider all these
other patterns mixed conditionals.
Examples:
1. If the water gets hot enough, it will boil.
2. If he put the picture up a little higher, it would look better.
3. If we had taken the medicine, we would not have got sick.
Don't
take the idea of "real" and "unreal" too seriously. The first and
second conditionals are often nearly identical in meaning. The
first states the idea as a fact. The second states it as an
imagined action.
If you press this button, the gate will open. (Fact. This always happens.)
If you pressed this button, the gate would open. (Information about what to do if you want to open the gate -- not that you necessarily want to open it just now.)
The third conditional is more obviously "unreal". Neither clause taken separately actually happened.
If you had pressed this button, the gate would have opened. (You didn't press the button, and the gate didn't open. But more than that, the gate didn't open because you didn't press the button.)
CJ