Forums · General English Grammar & Vocabulary, Listening & Speaking · General English Grammar Questions
In the subjunctive, how would the two cases, one that has 'it were not' in the if-clause, and the other with 'there were/was not." be different? Are they both the subjunctive? Are they the same in terms of their structures?
If it were not for his financial support, we would not/could not manage.
If there were/was (which one is right?) not his financial support, we couldn't/wouldn't not manage.
If it were not for his financial support, we would not/could not manage.-- This is OK
(X) If there were/was not his financial support, we couldn't/wouldn't not manage. -- This is no good.
If that was a compliment, I'd hate to hear one of his insults! was -- indicative
People are waiting to help.
Live chatRegistered users can join here
Related forum topics:
Was versus Were?None of is/are able vs. none of us was/were able?There were or was?if I were, if I was?Subjunctive?were there/there were?but for... That were to be?was or were?If I were ...?where vs. were?There was vs. there were?Subjunctives?If it were not for?Were?Were there?Was/were?As it were?SUBJUNCTIVE MOOD (If I were or be )?