We have a wide variety of direct marketing options available, contact us here for more info.
1 2 3
Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Fri, Oct 12 2007 4:47 AM by CalifJim. 20 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Kooyeen  +  428333 Sun, 07 Oct 07 10:08 PM
Hi,
I wonder if with "suppose" and "immagine" both present tenses and subjunctives can be used. The following are all present in meaning (not past), are they all ok and idiomatic?

1 - Suppose you are on an island all by yourself. What would you do? / What do you do?
2 - Suppose you were on an island all by yourself. What would you do?

3 - Imagine you are on an island all by yourself. What would you do? / What do you do?
4 - Imagine you were on an island all by yourself. What would you do?


Comments will be appreciated. Thanks Smile [:)]

Joined on Thu, Dec 22 2005
Italy
Veteran Member 5,200
I'm on your internets, degrading your language with my ignorance and apathy
Ant_222  +  428377 Mon, 08 Oct 07 01:18 AM
While there's no replies...

I think they are both possible and, independent of which verb you use (suppose/imagine), Present Simple and subjunctive versions have different degrees of probability.

Completely improbable situations require the subjunctive:

Suppose/Imagine you were a woman.
If you were a woman...






Joined on Sun, May 21 2006
Podolsk, Russia
Contributing Member 1,742
Kooyeen  +  428619 Mon, 08 Oct 07 07:45 PM
Hi,
well, it's not true that improbable or impossible situations require the subjunctive... but I really don't know if the subjunctive is natural with "suppose" and "imagine". I'm afraid it's only ok with "suppose", so #4 is the only one that is unnatural. But I also think present tenses are much more common, so #1 and #3 are the most natural ones... Does this make any sense? Thanks Smile [:)]

CalifJim  +  428667 Mon, 08 Oct 07 09:36 PM
I see no problem of any kind with any of your examples.
Within 1 and 3, I prefer What do you do?, but your alternative raises no eyebrows either.  Smile [:)]

CJ

Joined on Mon, Aug 2 2004
California
Veteran Member 24,203
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
Kooyeen  +  428681 Mon, 08 Oct 07 10:51 PM
Ok, thanks Smile [:)]

Ant_222  +  429006 Tue, 09 Oct 07 07:31 PM
CJ:

Which one of these would you prefer?

1. Suppose you were a woman, would you try to seduce him?

2. Suppose you are a woman? Would you try to seduce him?

Thanks in advance.
Marius Hancu, 2 yr 161 days ago
Only:
1. Suppose you were a woman, would you try to seduce him?

Ant_222  +  429046 Tue, 09 Oct 07 09:13 PM
Marius:

«Only:
1. Suppose you were a woman, would you try to seduce him?»

Yeah, so I just can't conciliate your reply with Kooyeen's... Is my first post in the thread right?

Sorry for bothering...
Kooyeen  +  429083 Tue, 09 Oct 07 10:49 PM
Hi Ant,
what's the problem? You can say "Suppose you are..." or "Suppose you were..."

Your sentence #2 is not good because there is an odd question mark...
2. Suppose you are a woman? Would you try to seduce him?

So I'm not sure what you are asking now... Smile [:)]

1 2 3
© MediaCet Ltd. 2010, v5.0.3715.30106. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.