As we all stood and listened, Peter Duncanson sung the following words:
"Would you please explain to me, in Canada, why are private schools called "public schools" I've never could understand this oddity."
"The Wikipedia article explains this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public school British Isles In the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland, the term ... of further or higher education apart from medical schools, and is otherwise restricted to primary and secondary schools. (1) http://tinyurl.com/ubnyv"
I would suggest that there is a cultural distinction hidden by the above. The term "public school" sometimes appears to be used in a way that suggests such places as Eton and Harrow, whereas "independent school" (or perhaps I mean "private school"?) can more readily suggest places that charge far less, are less bound up with stuffy tradition, and don't exist in order to churn out students who will go on to attend Oxbridge and then in turn go on to run the country. The upper classes used to go to public school, whereas the aspirational middle class would send their children to an independent/private school.
Just my twopenn'orth, though.
A. Gwilliam
To e-mail me, replace "bottomless pit" with "devnull"