Hi milky. (Have you given up our discussion on modal auxiliaries?)
| Tense is used for more than just time |
|
I think it's a good point. Quine once said:
Our ordinary language shows a tiresome bias in its treatment of time. Relations of date are exalted grammatically (..). This bias is of itself an inelegance, or breach of theoretical simplicity. Moreover, the form it takes ??that of requiring that every verb form show a tense??is peculialy productive of needless complications, since it demands lip service to time even when time is farthest from our thoughts.
(Quine1960:170) |
|
Seems you shares your view with Quine, don't you?
I can understand now Quine's statement. Granted that his and your point make good sense, I'd give your examples different descriptions.
Exapmle 1: this usage of simple present tense is similar to its usge for .
(Have you ever seen any scenarios which are not written in simple present tense?)
Exapmle 2: Future tense. These sentences describe events which will take place in some future world.
(I'm not so sure: Have I missed your point ..?)