Tenses

   Share on Facebook  
Newguest  #572185  Wed, 01 Oct 08 12:08 PM

Hi

A press release issude today says that security issues were/had been/have been one of the chief topics of the talks.

--- I suppose that "were" and "had been" are correct?

 

If I start the sentence: The spokesman informed that .. will anything change as far as the tenses are concerned?

Thanks

  
Top 75 Contributor
Joined on Sun, Feb 25 2007
Contributing Member (1,229)
Mister Micawber  #572199  Wed, 01 Oct 08 01:03 PM
.
And what about 'says'?

I suggest:

(A press release issued today said that / The spokesman informed the press that) security issues were/had been one of the chief topics of the talks.

  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Wed, Aug 4 2004
Yokohama
Veteran Member (22,710)
SystemAdministratorTeachers
'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master-- that's all.'
Newguest  #572210  Wed, 01 Oct 08 01:24 PM

Hi

OK, so I should use "said" and then either "were" or "had been". Actually I understand the usage of the past perfect (because it happened before) and I'm not sure why "were" is also correct?

And if we left "says," i.e., A press release issued today says that security issues .. (and now the second part should be in the past)

I'm quoting this example because in one of my books on business English the example starts precisely: A press release issued today SAYS .. (and then I'm supposed to write the second part of the sentence in the past tense)

  
Mister Micawber  #572216  Wed, 01 Oct 08 01:36 PM
.
Were is also correct because there is no real confusion about the order of the past events.  Says is common journalistic (historical present) narrative, but I don't like it here because it is inserted between two past tenses-- very sloppy.  I suppose that if you keep it, you could use present perfect-- or present-- besides past:

A press release issued today says that security issues were/are/have been one of the chief topics of the talks.

It all depends on whether the talks were finished at the time.
  
Newguest  #572223  Wed, 01 Oct 08 02:01 PM

Mister Micawber
.

A press release issued today says that security issues were/are/have been one of the chief topics of the talks.


In this case "had been" is incorrect?

But it would also be correct to say: ..will be one of the chief topics of the talks. (although it was supposed to be the past tense)

Thanks

  
Mister Micawber  #572356  Wed, 01 Oct 08 11:46 PM
.
Yes, I don't think had been works at all there.

Says...will be
Said...would be
  
Newguest  #572416  Thu, 02 Oct 08 09:25 AM

Thank you!

  
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL General English Grammar Questions
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions & Terms of Service