We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Sun, Mar 23 2008 5:13 AM by Avangi. 3 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Kins_10  +  491065 Thu, 20 Mar 08 02:05 PM

What are the differences between these two tenses?

1. I have been told that the seminar will be held next week.

2. I was told that the seminar will be held next week.

And, can someone please explain the use of the past perfect tense in this sentence?

3. Down the basement, the day Deb and I said goodbye, my hand holding the gun had seemed the centre of everything, Laplace's fixed point from which the rest of the universe could be understood.

thanks.

Joined on Thu, Feb 21 2008
sarawak
New Member 38
kins
Philip  +  491073 Thu, 20 Mar 08 02:26 PM
No difference between the first two sentences.

The gun no longer meant as much as it had in the past, previously.
Joined on Thu, Jun 23 2005
Veteran Member 8,733
At reise er at leve! - H. C. Andersen
Kins_10  +  492009 Sun, 23 Mar 08 04:20 AM

Maybe i didn't explain myself very clearly. What i meant was how do the past tense and pluperfect affect the entire meaning of this sentence in the context of time?

1. Does the have-been used in this sentence indicate an act of repetition?

2.  Does the use of was indicate the person was told only once at the time when he is uttering it?

Thanks.Smile

Avangi  +  492012 Sun, 23 Mar 08 05:13 AM

Kins_10

Maybe i didn't explain myself very clearly. What i meant was how do the past tense and pluperfect affect the entire meaning of this sentence in the context of time?

1. Does the have-been used in this sentence indicate an act of repetition?

2.  Does the use of was indicate the person was told only once at the time when he is uttering it?

Thanks.Smile

I agree  with your analyses of 1.& 2., but I don't hear them as mutually exclusive.  1. could still be a single telling and 2. could still be multiple tellings   -    but the inference is as you suggest.

Re #3, I get the feeling there's a third point in time which would have been made clear in earlier context.  There's also a past tense after the basement, and there's the time of the telling. So past perfect would refer to the basement incident.  The use of past perfect suggests that things would soon change in the next time frame (which would still be simple past to the narrator.)

Joined on Mon, Nov 19 2007
Veteran Member 8,172
". . . le plaisir delicieux et toujours nouveau d'une occupation inutile." - Henri de Regnier
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3607.32596. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.