Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Tue, May 23 2006 12:40 AM by MrPedantic. 4 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Anonymous  +  227201 Sat, 20 May 06 11:05 AM

Dear Group,

Can I start a sentence in present perfect tense and then later go into past tense while being on same subject.

e.g. We've been to the local supermarkets and brought some stationeries and etc.

Appreciate if anyone could comment, thank you.

Regards,

Jeeva   

This is a live chat room, hosted on the chat page. You can also click here to see the chat in fullscreen.
MrPedantic  +  227216 Sat, 20 May 06 12:46 PM

Hello Jeeva

Your example is a little misleading, as it allows for ellipsis, i.e.

1. We have been to the local supermarket and (have) bought some stationery, etc.

To test for whether we can mix the present perfect with the simple past, we need to use an irregular verb for the second verb. Here's an example. First, a present perfect in both clauses, as in #1:

2. We've been to Buckingham Palace and (have) seen the Queen.

Now compare:

3. We've been to Buckingham Palace and saw the Queen.

To my ears, this is a little awkward; it would be better to use either #2, or to write:

4. We've been to Buckingham Palace; we saw the Queen.

MrP

Joined on Tue, Oct 12 2004
Veteran Member 13,616
...opella forensis / adducit febris...
Marius Hancu  +  227303 Sat, 20 May 06 05:57 PM
MrP said:

>2. We've been to Buckingham Palace and (have) seen the Queen.

Yes, I too prefer this version.

The others are playing with the temporal sense of the reader and possibly messing him up.
Joined on Wed, Apr 26 2006
Veteran Member 11,673
CalifJim  +  227703 Mon, 22 May 06 07:10 AM
we need to use an irregular verb for the second verb

Wasn't brought [sic] (bought) irregular?  Smile [:)]

CJ
Joined on Mon, Aug 2 2004
California
Veteran Member 22,128
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
MrPedantic  +  227918 Tue, 23 May 06 12:40 AM

So it is!

I was looking for a word that meant "with different forms for the past participle and simple past". The wrong one presented itself...

© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3598.39794. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.