We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


1 2
Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Thu, Nov 5 2009 4:28 PM by Kooyeen. 9 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Kooyeen  +  961041 Tue, 03 Nov 09 11:38 PM
I'm sick and tired because I can't seem to find a decent answer to some questions. So guess what, I'm gonna try to find out something more myself, doing experiments like a crazy scientist.

I need to test native speakers' ears (and maybe mouths), but non-native speakers can take part in the experiments as well of course.






1.1) What does the woman say in the clip?

Joined on Thu, Dec 22 2005
Italy
Senior Member 4,969
Parental Advisory / Explicit Posts
chiliblossom  +  961046 Tue, 03 Nov 09 11:47 PM
It has not been fixed.


I like being part of experiments, even if the scientist is crazy.

Joined on Sat, Oct 31 2009
New Member 10
Kooyeen  +  961051 Tue, 03 Nov 09 11:59 PM
Now it's fixed! Finally!
raindoctor  +  961082 Wed, 04 Nov 09 01:20 AM
"This is MPR"


Due to assimilation, One can produce MPR instead of NPR;one can hear MPR  Another example: " S n P" is heard as SMP, and is produced as SMP instead of SNP.


Joined on Sun, Apr 26 2009
Junior Member 67
dokterjokkebrok  +  961294 Wed, 04 Nov 09 07:31 AM
I hear NPR. 

Don't ask me why though. I played it back like 30 times, and if I had to choose one, it'd be 'N'.



 

Joined on Sun, Jun 21 2009
The Netherlands
Full Member 226
"Experience is the name we all give to our mistakes." Oscar Wilde
Ivanhr, 17 days ago
I hear; This is NPR.
epsilon, 17 days ago
Definitely "NPR"!!! :D
Kooyeen  +  961770 Wed, 04 Nov 09 09:10 PM
Thanks for the replies.


raindoctor

Due to assimilation, One can produce MPR instead of NPR;one can hear MPR  Another example: " S n P" is heard as SMP, and is produced as SMP instead of SNP.


By the way, raindoctor, are you a native speaker with "native ears"? From North America, the UK, where? If you are not willing to tell it, forget these couple of lines.

Anyway, I'll go straight to the point. What I'm trying to find out is how sensitive native speakers' ears are when assimilation of this kind is involved.

I learned such kinds of assimilation are not automatic in English, unlike in Italian (In Italian, "un pesce" would always be pronounced "um pesce"). As far as I know, in English it isn't automatic (it is more likely in certain dialects, and the faster the speech, the more likely the assimilation), and the assimilation can be partial.

So production can vary from non assimilated (the tongue moves all the way up to form the /n/) to assimilated (the tongue doesn't even move and you go straight to the bilabial sound)... but production and perception are separated concepts, I guess. If production varies, how does perception vary?

Which boils down to the question: while native speakers can easily produce both non-assimilated NPR and MPR, can they also easily distinguish them?


I think (but I'm not sure at all) that maybe I would only be able to distinguish /np, nb, nm/ from /mp, mb, mm/ in very slow careful speech, and the difference would still be too small for me to consider it "phonemically" important. But it's hard to say how well native speakers understand: they usually guess from the context, using a kind of top-down noise reduction (from context and words down to phonemes). Yet natives' ears must be very sensitive anyway, because they can easily detect traces of accents that are either foreign or different from their own.


So I decided to try to understand more about English speakers' ears with some little experiments. I recorded some audio clips from both NPR (National Public Radio) and MPR (Minnesota Public Radio). Then I chose one, it's simple and in high quality for voice (128 kb/s).

And so we simply need to consider one question... Can native speakers tell if that's Minnesota Public Radio or if it's National Public Radio, and how sure are they about their choice?


That's all. Keep placing your bets guys! You might win something, LOL.






raindoctor  +  961782 Wed, 04 Nov 09 09:22 PM
Koyeen,


The clarity depends upon who is speaking. One working for NPR produces MPR, since that word is frequently used (in other words, frequency dictates the production as well).


Lemme give another example: "open". I don't hear "n" when it is produced by L1 speakers in my area; but i hear it from L2 speakers.


L1: 'oʊpm (here m is produced and is heard); dictionaries are not much of help, since MW and reference.com doesn't list this pronunciation at all. The key is that the second syllable is not stressed, leading to elision of "e".


L2 speakers: oʊpən oʊpɛn


1 2
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3607.32596. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.