We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!
Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
YoungCalifornian
+
202553
Thu, 02 Mar 06 06:23 PM
Here's a breakdown of which states voted for which candidate in the 2004 presidential election. Blue states are those won by John Kerry, and red states are those won by George Bush. The numbers you see are the total electoral votes each state has, which is supposed to be a reflection of its population. Keep in mind that if 51% of a state voted for George Bush, while 49% voted for John Kerry, Bush would get all the electoral votes from that state. The trend you may notice is that states with large urban populations tended to vote for Kerry, while more rural states voted for Bush.

Joined on
Mon, Feb 14 2005
Los Angeles, California
Regular Member
586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Janissary
+
202839
Fri, 03 Mar 06 02:33 PM
thnx for your explanation and information yc.
the same thing is valid for Turkey, as well. The more industrialized,improved states are the more liberal states. The less industrialized,rural are more conservative.
Joined on
Mon, Jan 23 2006
Istanbul
Full Member
494
speak english or die
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazarus
+
202920
Fri, 03 Mar 06 11:07 PM
Janissary wrote: | thnx for your explanation and information yc.
the same thing is valid for Turkey, as well. The more
industrialized,improved states are the more liberal states. The less
industrialized,rural are more conservative. |
|
The problem for us, Janissary, is that the less developed, conservative
states outnumber the progressive ones substantially. You can see
that pretty clearly on that map.
Lazarus
Joined on
Wed, Sep 28 2005
U.S.
Full Member
285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
milky
+
202944
Sat, 04 Mar 06 12:13 AM
Janissary wrote: | |
firstly i dont agree al quadee or whatsoever is responsible for this but i think America which is trying to incite different minds into a chaos in order to remain longer in iraq by pretexting the chaos. thats what i think.if the chaos is over they ll be no pretext to remain in iraq for Usa.
|
|
It's certainly a possibility, Janissary.
Joined on
Thu, Jan 15 2004
Senior Member
3,149
Hume said that if we had perfect or complete descriptive knowledge of reality, we could not, by reasoning, derive a single valid "ought".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
milky
+
202947
Sat, 04 Mar 06 12:21 AM
YoungCalifornian wrote: | |
In response to this, let me just say that I totally agree with Lazarus. Trust us Janissary, Americans want out of Iraq as fast as reasonably possible.
|
|
Is that because you are losing that war? You skipped Vietnam, a little too late mind you, when you realised you were losing that one.
<Americans want out of Iraq as fast as reasonably possible>
.More than half the Americans that were polled, actually. Still less than half a lot want to stay in.
The figures:
In the latest USA TODAY poll, a record 60% of those surveyed, including one in four Republicans, said the war wasn't "worth it." One in five Republicans said the invasion of Iraq was "a mistake."
Among independents, 60% called the war a mistake; 85% of Democrats agreed. There was no gender gap on the issue — that is, no difference in the opinions of men and women — but there was a racial divide. Half of whites saw the war as a mistake. Among blacks, that view was almost universal, held by 95%.
Concern over the course and costs of the Iraq war has become a major factor in unease about the direction of the country generally. In January, a 58% majority said things were going well for the United States. By this month, only 49% said things were going well.
Most of those who say things are going well in the country support the war. Most who say things are going badly — 50% of those polled — call it a mistake.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-11-15-poll-vietnam_x.htm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazarus
+
202962
Sat, 04 Mar 06 01:24 AM
Milky wrote: |
Is that because you are losing that war? You skipped Vietnam, a
little too late mind you, when you realised you were losing that one. |
|
milky--
What you've written here is a schoolyard bait. If you think
Americans want out of Iraq because they are "losing it" (as if we were
ever winning anything), your perspective isn't native, that's for
sure. As far as Vietnam, let sleeping dogs lie. That dog
has been sleeping a long time.
Lazarus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
milky
+
202986
Sat, 04 Mar 06 02:22 AM
Lazarus wrote: | Milky wrote: |
Is that because you are losing that war? You skipped Vietnam, a little too late mind you, when you realised you were losing that one.
|
|
milky-- What you've written here is a schoolyard bait. If you think Americans want out of Iraq because they are "losing it" (as if we were ever winning anything), your perspective isn't native, that's for sure. As far as Vietnam, let sleeping dogs lie. That dog has been sleeping a long time.
Lazarus
|
|
There's no bait there, Lazarus. It's a fair question and the present situation has parallels with the one around the pull out from Vietnam.
So, tell us why you think that 54% of Americans want out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lazarus
+
203019
Sat, 04 Mar 06 05:22 AM
Milky wrote: | Lazarus wrote: | Milky wrote: |
Is that because you are losing that war? You skipped Vietnam, a
little too late mind you, when you realised you were losing that one.
|
|
milky-- What you've written here is a schoolyard
bait. If you think Americans want out of Iraq because they are
"losing it" (as if we were ever winning anything), your perspective
isn't native, that's for sure. As far as Vietnam, let sleeping
dogs lie. That dog has been sleeping a long time.
Lazarus
|
|
So, tell us why you think that 54% of Americans want out. |
|
Because many Americans feel they were bamboozled into going there to
begin with. It's got nothing to do with how hard it is
there. It has to do with our lack of objectives there.
Lazarus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
milky
+
203060
Sat, 04 Mar 06 10:24 AM
Lazarus wrote: | Milky wrote: | Lazarus wrote: | Milky wrote: |
Is that because you are losing that war? You skipped Vietnam, a little too late mind you, when you realised you were losing that one.
|
|
milky-- What you've written here is a schoolyard bait. If you think Americans want out of Iraq because they are "losing it" (as if we were ever winning anything), your perspective isn't native, that's for sure. As far as Vietnam, let sleeping dogs lie. That dog has been sleeping a long time.
Lazarus
|
|
So, tell us why you think that 54% of Americans want out.
|
|
Because many Americans feel they were bamboozled into going there to begin with. It's got nothing to do with how hard it is there. It has to do with our lack of objectives there.
Lazarus
|
|
And maybe these things:
Cost of America's War in Iraq
$244,838,794,045
............
Number of U.S. Military Personnel Slaughtered (Officially acknowledged) In America's War 2298
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/
|
|
|
|
|
|