The Callan Method

1 2 3 4 5 6
   Share on Facebook  
Anonymous  #179691  Fri, 06 Jan 06 02:23 PM

All based on repetition drills and memorization. Not in line with modern communicative approaches. Do not expect great results.

Danilo

  
Anonymous  #189244  Fri, 27 Jan 06 04:40 AM
I have been teaching for about three years with the method now. I am also a  CELTA qualified teacher and have used a variety of approaches in various countries.

I am currently teaching at a school using this method.

There are certainly many pro's and con's in this method. As we have seen from previous posts, the method is restrictive and tiring to both students and teachers. Creativity is dicouraged and it is almost exclusively speaking-based learning. Teacher are seldom qualified teachers as the training takes only one week, and because everything is scripted, a knowledge of grammar is not required. The only requirement for a teacher is to be a native speaker who speaks clearly. (This is not always true for schools outside the UK). As I did my training at the Callan School in London, I use this as my base.

Some good points of the method for the teacher is that there is no need for lesson preparation, not a lot to learn for novice teachers and constant interaction with students.

My personal opinion is a bit divided. Although I use the method at the moment, I have found that the method is incredibly effective with beginners, but do not offer a solid base at higher levels where communication rather than accurate speech is required.

With the Callan Method, students do not hear the natural rhythm of English but are rather drilled in the correct pronunciation, word order etc.

The method is approx 40 years old and many of the questions in the book are outdated and some material at the higher levels of Book 6 & 7 even show Robin Callan as a women-hating, racist character. Also some of the material in the book takes a quite morbid view on life.

The method is structured in a way so as student can gradually pick up the 2000 or so most commonly used words in English. By forcing students to speak and corecting constantly, students learn very quickly at beginner level.

From a business perspective though, the Callan Method is great. Minimum input with maximum rewards. The cost of classes are lower as teachers are not qualified and are paid below the average. As many as 14 students can be put into one class and not material other than the books are needed. The initial cost of setting up a school is limited to a couple of chairs and a lecturn.

I do not think that this method is designed to give student a good grounding in English. The more I teach it the more I realize that it was designed with economic benefit in mind. That being said, classes are usually cheaper than at other schools, so students tend to flock to the schools.

I do not like the method because I do not think it is the best approach available. Why do I teach it then? Well I am a part-time teacher and very pressed for time so I do not have a lot of time to prepare lessons. I like the idea that I can come in to school 10 minutes before my lesson, look at the pages to be taught and go teach them. I have used other approaches as well and are gradually suggesting them to our director as an alternative for higher level students.

If you are interested in teaching with the Callan Method, the best place to start is the Callan School in Oxford street, London.

For more info visit:

www.callan.com
  
Anonymous  #196691  Tue, 14 Feb 06 01:42 PM
oops!
callan.com ?
Maybe i just didn't get the joke.... or maybe you meant:
[link]

  
Anonymous  #235685  Tue, 13 Jun 06 09:32 PM
Yes I kow about callan method and it is wery good it gives a chans to learn English very fast and easyly. there's 7 book. If u want additional information I can help 
  
Anonymous  #263530  Thu, 07 Sep 06 12:52 AM

It is humourous to hear someone say that this method is not in line with current language learning theory. What is in line with current theory? Most current theory purports to focus on the student, the communicative method, but it actually serves the purposes of the teacher, to be able to be creative and feel rewarded because he/she gets to do things that reflect themselves. The problem that teachers have is that they think that teaching a second language is about giving them a rewarding and fulfilling career. If you look at it from a strictly utilitarian point of view, modern language teaching practices are no more effective than old practices.

Callan style language instruction was used during WWII to train people to be able to speak German, Italian and Japanese very rapidly, in 3 months or so. And it worked.

To dismiss the Callan Method without looking at the real effect is dishonest. It is a great way for beginners to learn the rudiments of English. I have witnessed 45 yr old men who had high school or less education, learn to function with a basic knowledge of English in a month.

For Intermediate speakers, the switch to a Communicative, content-based curriculum is more effective.

My advice, never base your opinion in L2 acquisition based on current academic thought...find out for yourself!

  
Openmind  #267936  Sat, 16 Sep 06 02:45 PM
I also think that through the Callan Method beginners can achieve quite some good results within a short period of time. However, the Callan Method has a lot of drawbacks. Let's start with the fact the materials are far too old, some of the expressions contained are no longer used in modern English. The dialogues are very artificial and don't resemble authentic situations. Also, the entire method reminds me a bit of military drill exercises. That's why Callan will be especially successful in former communist countries where people still have a hard time thinking and acting on themselves. After all, even a beginner could watch a cartoon movie like Find Nemo or Iceace which would be much more useful than sitting in a Callan class.
  
Top 500 Contributor
Joined on Wed, Aug 23 2006
EU
Junior Member (86)
Anonymous  #275671  Tue, 03 Oct 06 02:14 PM
I taught with this method for a number of month, and noticed great improvement with my students in a matter of weeks. The repetition and speed with which it is taught is very effective
  
Openmind  #275823  Tue, 03 Oct 06 10:57 PM
Yes, it's a very effective for people who don't want to think for themselves, people who love to conform and be drilled.
  
Anonymous  #287104  Sun, 29 Oct 06 07:52 PM

Most students like it, although the older ones find it tiring at first. You can see a quick result at lower levels, however for intermediated and above extra martial is often needed. As a teacher you have to be energetic which also wears you out especially if you have 4 or 5 hours back to back. It’s also easy not to be so spontaneous with the questioning and end up going round in succession. I enjoyed teaching it and found a positive response from the groups and it was nice not having to do much preparation.

Wink [;)]
  
1 2 3 4 5 6
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: Teaching English (TEFL)
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions & Terms of Service