We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Thu, Sep 8 2005 5:43 AM by CalifJim. 3 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Nehrutrophy  +  134701 Wed, 07 Sep 05 10:11 AM
What is the real difference between the words 'sports' and 'games'. Dictionaries do not pin point the difference. Are they same in all respects?
Joined on Thu, Sep 1 2005
India
New Member 10
pieanne  +  134703 Wed, 07 Sep 05 10:24 AM

As a start, I'd say that "games" implies "competition", whereas "sports" doesn't.

Joined on Thu, Jan 20 2005
South of France ...But I'm Belgian!
Veteran Member 7,517
I'm glad to help, but I'm not a native! And please excuse my typos...
Philip  +  134821 Wed, 07 Sep 05 05:11 PM
 Pieanne wrote:

As a start, I'd say that "games" implies "competition", whereas "sports" doesn't.

We certainly use 'games' to talk about competition, especially in the case of the Olympic Games.  Other than that, I think there are several uses of the two, some of which overlap and contradict.

Sports: physical activities vs. Games: cards, checkers, etc.

Sport: a specific athletics (baseball) vs. Game: one event of competition (we're going to the baseball game today).

There's also the idea of 'game' in the sense of 'hunting'  or other participation ("If you want to travel to Japan this year, I'm "game"). 

This is probably just a beginning.

 

Joined on Thu, Jun 23 2005
Veteran Member 8,726
At reise er at leve! - H. C. Andersen
CalifJim  +  134995 Thu, 08 Sep 05 05:43 AM

Sports are usually athletic games, but also include races, which are not usually called games, but races.  Not all games involve or require athletic skills, for example, Scrabble and other word games.  Also, sports are not typically games of chance, like card games, although horse racing is considered a sport ( a race ) and not a game.

>>

<>See Wittgenstein’s famous remarks on games if you’re feeling philosophical.  Wittgenstein's point is not that it is impossible to define "game", but that we don't have a definition, and we don't need one.”>>

CJ
Joined on Mon, Aug 2 2004
California
Veteran Member 22,379
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3607.32596. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.