Sanz  +  157342 Fri, 11 Nov 05 03:43 AM what do you think the end of the world will be? 1. Nuclear, bilogical war 2. Mortal viruses 3. Human kind will finish with each natural resource 4. A global and natural disaster 5. God will destroy it   I choose number 4 Sanz Joined on Sat, Sep 17 2005 Full Member 110 Thanks a lot for helping me!

	Mike in Japan  +  157378 Fri, 11 Nov 05 06:55 AM Not knowing exactly what God is, I go with number 45, unless I go sooner. Mike in Japan Joined on Tue, Aug 19 2003 Senior Member 4,370 I do like to be beside the seaside

	Stannum  +  157548 Fri, 11 Nov 05 05:51 PM when the sun becomes a red dwarf and the earth is either subsumed or continues to circle a cold impotent star but as this event is some billions of years in the future i choose to not worry too much robert life is way more stubborn than most realize Stannum Joined on Fri, Oct 28 2005 Melbourne Australia Regular Member 526

	Sanz  +  157586 Fri, 11 Nov 05 08:04 PM  Stannum wrote: when the sun becomes a red dwarf and the earth is either subsumed or continues to circle a cold impotent star but as this event is some billions of years in the future i choose to not worry too much robert life is way more stubborn than most realize however if we look back in time we'll see that lot of natural disasters have happened and almost finished all kind of live. I read that even a black hole could swallow our solar system! Sanz

	Francesca  +  157756 Sat, 12 Nov 05 12:10 PM Hi, I think the human kind will finish each natural resource, and we will not be able to stop pollution and to recycle garbage, everything and everyone will choke! Francesca Joined on Tue, Oct 11 2005 Contributing Member 1,786

	Sanz  +  157832 Sat, 12 Nov 05 04:15 PM I think that nature laws always eliminate those beings who are becoming harm to the planet... so who knows if nature finish with us before whe fisnish it? Sanz

	Lionel In Paris  +  158198 Sun, 13 Nov 05 06:20 PM 1 to 4 might destroy all life at the moment, but they will not cause the end of the world. 5) Why should he bother to destroy a small backward race of semi-intellgent apes located on a third rate planet in a distant insignificant backwater galaxy. Oh I forgot..........we're His chosen children and he loves us. Totally logical now......... he creates the world, waits four and a half billion years for us to arrive then blows it all up because we argue. I suppose we should count ourselves lucky, if he didn't love us we would really be in trouble.   Lionel  Lionel In Paris Joined on Thu, Oct 20 2005 Junior Member 94

	Stannum  +  158210 Sun, 13 Nov 05 06:45 PM  Lionel In Paris wrote: 5) Why should he bother to destroy a small backward race of semi-intellgent apes located on a third rate planet in a distant insignificant backwater galaxy. Oh I forgot..........we're His chosen children and he loves us. Totally logical now......... he creates the world, waits four and a half billion years for us to arrive then blows it all up because we argue. I suppose we should count ourselves lucky, if he didn't love us we would really be in trouble.   Lionel  i do not think that a god would bother but this will not bother the god botherers who will continue to bother us robert do god botherers bother only the bretherin or do god botherers bother god Stannum

	Mike in Japan  +  158321 Mon, 14 Nov 05 01:13 AM I'm probably missing something obvious here, but what is a God botherer? Anyway, I agree with Lionel;  Lionel In Paris wrote: I suppose we should count ourselves lucky, if he [God] didn't love us we would really be in trouble. Mike in Japan