We have a wide variety of direct marketing options available, contact us here for more info.
This question is Not Answered
|
|
|
|
|
|
New2grammar
+
316074
Tue, 16 Jan 07 09:03 PM
1. I enjoy browsing the Internet.
2. I don't plan to go into the office tomorrow. I will work from home.
In sentences above, is the article 'the' needed? If yes, is the need for the definite article similar to the common phrase 'in the hospital'?
3. email or e-mail
4. cell phone or cellphone
Thanks in advance
Joined on
Tue, Nov 21 2006
Veteran Member
7,676
Who wants to go sailing around the world with me?
|
|
|
|
|
spinnaker,
3 yr 64 days ago
email, e-mail and E-Mail all are right. btw: why is Internet always with a capital letter?
|
|
|
|
|
|
The17pointscale
+
316087
Tue, 16 Jan 07 09:20 PM
personally, i feel that "internet" and "website" are more idiomatic, but the grammar gods still prefer "Internet" and "Web site." Here's a quote from the Chicago Manual of Style Q&A: Q. Which is currently accepted: Web site, web site, website, or Website?
A. A lot of people are writing “website.” A lot of people have come to prefer “website.”
But formal usage still calls for “Web site,” in recognition of the initiatives
of the World Wide Web Consortium (write “Web-site” as an adjective). The most
elaborately formal modern American publication I can think of, the New Yorker, still writes “Web site,” but then again, they also write “E-mail,”
“coördinate,” and “reëxamine”—they
are very particular. We at Chicago are very particular too, and we recommend “Web site.”
But our press as a whole is not in the position of publishing a single, unified publication—such as
a magazine. It is easier to apply a set of standard rules and never vary from them for one publication, but rules applying
to all sorts of books, articles, and other writing must be a little more flexible. Moreover, when a word gets used a lot it
tends to lose any awkward edges (and what could be more awkward than a compound formed of one capitalized word and one lowercased word?). Each new book that appears on the scene
presents an opportunity for an author to express a usage preference or to demonstrate a familiarity with changing usage.
But generally, I would recommend “Web site” for formal writing, but “website”
for informal writing or friendly writing. Unless, of course, you prefer “Web site”
even when you’re being friendly.
Joined on
Thu, Jan 26 2006
Seattle
Junior Member
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
spinnaker
+
316111
Tue, 16 Jan 07 10:49 PM
Thank you. It's interesting that there are "conversations" about things like that. I prefer this one: | But generally, I would recommend “Web site” for formal writing, but “website”
for informal writing or friendly writing. Unless, of course, you prefer “Web site”
even when you’re being friendly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grammar Geek
+
316173
Wed, 17 Jan 07 02:17 AM
Spinnaker, the Chicago Manual of Style has a great monthly Q&A, and the editors who write it can be very funny. While it's helpful to actually have a copy of CMOS, you can access their Q&A without it. Many people think that CMOS is "clunky" (and I would agree) but it's full of good stuff.
www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/CMS_FAQ/new/new_questions01.html
Joined on
Tue, Jan 10 2006
Veteran Member
20,881
Barbara, who answers in American English. My housekeeping skills attest to the truth of the second law of thermodynamics: Left to themselves, things get more and more random!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
spinnaker
+
316412
Wed, 17 Jan 07 05:18 PM
Grammar Geek wrote: | Spinnaker, the Chicago Manual of Style has a great monthly Q&A, and the editors who write it can be very funny. While it's helpful to actually have a copy of CMOS, you can access their Q&A without it. Many people think that CMOS is "clunky" (and I would agree) but it's full of good stuff.
www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/CMS_FAQ/new/new_questions01.html |
|
Yes, thank you for the link. It's interesting to read this Q&A, but I will never post there any question, because of my worse English.
|
|
|
|
|
|