1 2
Who can explain to me why we sometimes hear "there's a lot of people" instead of "there are a lot of people", especially on films and some tv programmes? Can we accept it as correct informal language?
Junior Member54
Thread is locked
Well, "There's a lot of people" isn't really correct, as far as I know. You're talking about more than one person, so you would use "are" instead of "is". Unless you're talking about a physical "lot" of people, like if you have a bunch of slaves, and you group them as a "lot"...in that case, since they were being referred to as one "lot" or entity, you could say, "There is a lot of people up for auction," or something like that. But slavery is an ugly thing, so let's hope that's not what they're talking about...
Full Member307
Thread is locked
thanks.Emotion: smile
Thread is locked
It should be "There are a lot of people..." (count noun)
"There is a lot of sugar..." (noncount noun)
Some native speakers use a singular verb even when the subject is plural, as in "There's some books on the shelf." This is fairly frequent, but it is not generally considered to be grammatically correct.Emotion: wink
New Member46
Thread is locked
Lot as in group at an auction. Say lot 25. Lot is a collective noun. Therefore we say there is a lot of people. Not many know this and it is not what is said colloquially. There are lots of people.
Regular Member664
Teachers: Users in this role are certified teachers. This may include DELTA, CELTA, TESOL, TEFL qualified professionals. Email a scan of your qualification to an admin, if you wish to be considered.
Thread is locked
There are a lot of people here. (googlehits: 3,820,000)
There's a lot of people here. (googlehits: 3,140,000)
There's lots of people here. (googlehits: 771,000)
There are lots of people here. (googlehits: 2,680,000)

You'll hear them all. I recommend that you give up on concord in this case.
Veteran Member92,357
SystemAdministrator: A system administrator takes care of the inner workings of the entire system. These users have the ability to promote, ban and modify other users.Teachers: Users in this role are certified teachers. This may include DELTA, CELTA, TESOL, TEFL qualified professionals. Email a scan of your qualification to an admin, if you wish to be considered.
Thread is locked
Charlotte,
Yes, we can accept it quite nicely as correct informal language!
"there's" (much more than "there is", by the way) is becoming neutral as to number.
As time goes on, it's quite possible that "there are" will drop out of the spoken language.
As it is now, in everyday conversation you will hear either "there's" or "there are" with a plural form.
CJ
Veteran Member53,494
Moderator: A super-user who takes care of the forums. You have the ability to message a moderator privately should you wish. These users have a range of elevated privileges including the deletion, editing and movement of posts when needed.Proficient Speaker: Users in this role are known to maintain an excellent grasp of the English language. You can only be promoted to this role by the Englishforums team.
Thread is locked
We had this debate very recently.

I think that, even when people will use the correct plural form in writing, we tend to use 'there's in speech' purely for the reason that it is easy to say whereas 'there're' is quite tricky.
Veteran Member11,782
Proficient Speaker: Users in this role are known to maintain an excellent grasp of the English language. You can only be promoted to this role by the Englishforums team.Retired Moderator: A moderator who has retired.
Thread is locked
Who can explain to me why we sometimes hear "there's a lot of people" instead of "there are a lot of people", especially on films and some tv programmes? Can we accept it as correct informal language?


Absolutely we can. There are a number of theories as to why ENLs choose the singular form with plurals, Nona offered one.

But, "{W}hatever the reason, in a study of spoken discourse, Celce-Murcia and Hudson (1981) confirmed that predominates in informal speech, even when a plural noun phrase follows the verb." {The Grammar Book, page 448}

This "informal speech" included that associated with {for Andrei} post graduate students and their professors, both BrE and AmE speakers.
Regular Member849
Thread is locked
Show more
Live chat
Registered users can join here