There started...

   Share on Facebook  
MarvinTheMartian  #527859  Mon, 16 Jun 08 01:36 AM
Hi, I was trying to write a paragraph about fox domestication the other day, but couldn't come up with a satisfactory description of the phenomenon I tried to encapsulate in the sentences below. Please look at the following sentences:

- After being bred in captivity for only a few generations, recently-born foxes began to develop different pelt colors, just like their close relative, the domestic dog.

- After only a few generations of being bred in captivity, a variation in pelt coloration arose among recently-born foxes, not unlike that of their close relative, the domestic dog.

- After only a few generations of being bred in captivity, there started to be a variation in pelt coloration among recently-born foxes, not unlike that of their close relative, the domestic dog.

I'm especially curious to know what you think of my third sentence. I generally tend to avoid using constructions that begin with "there started" because they sound weird to my ears (i.e. a bit stilted.) Am I the only one thinking that? Is there anything else you would say differently? Please explain.
  
Top 500 Contributor
Joined on Fri, Jan 18 2008
Full Member (165)
Avangi  #527865  Mon, 16 Jun 08 02:03 AM
Hi Marvin,

This is a challenge.  There's potential for ambiguity.  Does "recently-born" mean "newborn" or "recent generations"?  Did newborns begin to develop new/different coloration patterns as then matured, or did new/different coloration patterns begin to appear in succeeding generations?

Being a bit stilted myself, I'm not offended by "there started to appear."

  - A.
  
Top 25 Contributor
Joined on Mon, Nov 19 2007
Senior Member (3,289)
Proficient SpeakerTrusted Users
". . . le plaisir delicieux et toujours nouveau d'une occupation inutile." - Henri de Regnier
RayH  #527876  Mon, 16 Jun 08 02:27 AM

MarvinTheMartian
I'm especially curious to know what you think of my third sentence. I generally tend to avoid using constructions that begin with "there started" because they sound weird to my ears (i.e. a bit stilted.) Am I the only one thinking that? Is there anything else you would say differently? Please explain.

How about this alternative? "After only a few generations of captive breeding foxes develop variations in pelt coloration not unlike that of their close relative the domestic dog."

I don't see any need to specify "recently-born" since it's clear from the context that we are talking about the current generation of foxes.
  
Top 100 Contributor
Joined on Sat, Mar 22 2008
CA, USA
Regular Member (706)
Proficient SpeakerTrusted Users
Native speaker of U. S. English. Not a grammar expert.
Avangi  #527889  Mon, 16 Jun 08 03:14 AM
RayH
After only a few generations of captive breeding foxes develop variations in pelt coloration not unlike that of their close relative the domestic dog.
I think it's perfect.
  
Avangi  #527890  Mon, 16 Jun 08 03:15 AM
RayH
After only a few generations of captive breeding foxes develop variations in pelt coloration not unlike that of their close relative the domestic dog.
I think it's perfect.
  
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL General English Grammar Questions
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions & Terms of Service