This is a variant of that and v.v.

1 2
   Share on Facebook  
milky  #299909  Sat, 02 Dec 06 01:31 PM
Our Living Language In many Southern U.S. varieties of English, might can be paired with other auxiliary verbs such as could, as in We might could park over there. Words like might and could are known as modals, since they express certain “moods” (for example, I might go indicates an uncertain mood on the part of the speaker). Combinations such as might could, might would, and might can are known as double modals. Other less common combinations include may can, may will, and might should. Since double modals typically begin with may or might, they lessen the degree of conviction or certainty (much like the word possibly) more than a single modal does. Double modals are used, for example, to minimize the force of what one is saying, as when asking someone for a favor or when indicating displeasure. • Although double modals may sound odd outside of the South, they carry little if any social stigma within the South and are used by speakers of all social classes and educational levels—even in formal instances like political addresses. Like many features of Southern varieties of English, the use of double modals is probably due to the fact that many of the first English speakers in the South were Scotch-Irish, whose speech made use of double modals. This feature has been noted as far back as the Middle English period, but today's most common forms were not used to any great extent until the mid-18th century. They are surprisingly rare in dialect fiction but do occasionally occur, as in Old Yeller by Fred Gipson: “Jumper's liable to throw a fit with that hide rattling along behind him, and you might not can hold him by yourself.”

[link]
  
Top 50 Contributor
Joined on Thu, Jan 15 2004
Senior Member (3,149)
Hume said that if we had perfect or complete descriptive knowledge of reality, we could not, by reasoning, derive a single valid "ought".
Mister Micawber  #299933  Sat, 02 Dec 06 02:17 PM

they carry little if any social stigma within the South and are used by speakers of all social classes and educational levels—even in formal instances like political addresses.


This is untrue. The use of paired modals in the South (the land of my birth) remains the province of the poorly educated and the jocular.


  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Wed, Aug 4 2004
Yokohama
Veteran Member (22,704)
SystemAdministratorTeachers
'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master-- that's all.'
milky  #299947  Sat, 02 Dec 06 02:49 PM

 Mister Micawber wrote:

they carry little if any social stigma within the South and are used by speakers of all social classes and educational levels—even in formal instances like political addresses.


This is untrue. The use of paired modals in the South (the land of my birth) remains the province of the poorly educated and the jocular.


That's odd. Was your President poorly educated? How about Dan Rather? Poor education?

  
milky  #299948  Sat, 02 Dec 06 02:52 PM

 Mister Micawber wrote:

they carry little if any social stigma within the South and are used by speakers of all social classes and educational levels—even in formal instances like political addresses.


This is untrue. The use of paired modals in the South (the land of my birth) remains the province of the poorly educated and the jocular.


And how about the "most Southerners" below? Is that also untrue, or is it that you think most Southerners are poorly educated?

Other grammatical features are less widely known but are no less important. SAE also modifies the English auxiliary system by allowing for the use of more than one modal in a verb phrase. For instance, for most Southerners “I might could leave work early today” is a grammatically acceptable sentence. It translates roughly as “I might be able to leave work early,” but might could conveys a greater sense of tentativeness than might be able does.

  
Forbes  #300068  Sat, 02 Dec 06 11:51 PM

 Milky wrote:
"I might could be persuaded to try that."

But, could we say that "I could be persuaded to try that" is a variation/variant form of that sentence, and v.v.?

Yes.

What we achieve is to point out that "Standard English" is just one variety of "English" and that it should not be assumed that forms that differ from Standard English are deviations from Standard English. 

  
Top 100 Contributor
Joined on Thu, Jun 16 2005
Regular Member (839)
Proficient Speaker
1 2
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL Linguistics Discussion Forum
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions & Terms of Service