[title]Family quotes[/title] [description]Welcome to our family quotes section! Here you'll find some of the funniest (and wisest) quotes on the subject of family life![/description]
Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Mon, Oct 5 2009 3:52 PM by ecopsy. 5 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
ecopsy  +  928935 Mon, 05 Oct 09 02:25 PM
1.Somehow this sort of traditional Hamlet aspect in the untraditional character he was playing didn't seem to fit together.

2.The people who want to play with the cards that have goods trains on have to sit here.

What do the itallicized parts mean? They seem vague to a foreigner like me.

3.That teapot the duke has given to my aunt.

Anyway, is it a sentence?

The context(s) of the three is(are) not given where they are adpated.

Should it(they) be context/contexts, is/are in the sentence above?

Thanks in advance.

Joined on Tue, Sep 30 2008
Full Member 105
Grammar Geek  +  928948 Mon, 05 Oct 09 02:34 PM
Hi ecopsy,

 

1. This would work in the right context - describing a performance in the theater, for example.

2. This doesn't make sense - good trains on THEM could work if there were, for example, playing cards with different designs on their backs, among which was a deck of cards with pictures of "good trains." It would be a very unusual situation for this to make sense. What makes a good train? However, wtih the addition of "them" it's grammaticaly, if puzzling in meaning.

3. This is a noun phrase, and it could work as a stand-alone thing to say if you have just been asked "Which teapot do you mean?"

 

The contexts of the three sentences were not provided.(I chose plural because these seem to be utterly unrelated, and therefore each would have a differen context.)

 

 

 

Joined on Tue, Jan 10 2006
Veteran Member 19,683
Barbara, who answers in American English. My housekeeping skills attest to the truth of the second law of thermodynamics: Left to themselves, things get more and more random!
AlpheccaStars  +  928970 Mon, 05 Oct 09 02:52 PM
ecopsy
“1.Somehow this sort of traditional Hamlet aspect in the untraditional character he was playing didn't seem to fit together.

2.The people who want to play with the cards that have goods trains on have to sit here.


1) It is a very obtuse sentence. The reference "together" mentions only one thing - a feature in the character "Hamlet". Together always means two or more things

(Hamlet is the protagonist in Shakespeare's play of the same name. He is a young prince who is visited by his late father's ghost.  The ghost told that his brother murdered him, took his throne, and married his wife. The rest of the play concerns Hamlet's struggle with avenging his father.)


2) A "goods train" is a train that carries freight - logs, cattle, bulk grain, chemicals, etc.  These playing cards have pictures of such trains on one side.


ecopsy
“3.That teapot the duke has given to my aunt.”

It is a sentence, but sounds like a fragment by the use of "that" as a demonstrative pronoun, and the position of the direct object at the beginning of the sentence.

The better wording is:


That is the teapot that the duke...


I don't understand your last question. These sentences do not seem to be related at all to each other.


All the best

A-s


Joined on Sun, Oct 12 2008
Senior Member 3,508
The pen is mightier than the sword. Edward Bulwer-Lytton (1803-1873)
Grammar Geek  +  929002 Mon, 05 Oct 09 03:14 PM
Oh! I never saw that "S" in "goods train" - I thought it was a "good train" compared to a "bad train," I guess.


Thanks.

 

 

ecopsy  +  929057 Mon, 05 Oct 09 03:49 PM
All the three sentences are from Halliday's 'An Introduction to Functional Grammar' for which he didn't provide any context.

  I'd check the first sentence again to make sure I haven't spoiled it by typing errors.

  Your interprataion of the second sentence makes sense.

  And I didn't think the third is a sentence, and I'd hold to that after your explanation.

  For the last one, apparently that is a pseudo-problem for you native speakers. But as there is no plural forms at all in Chinese, I'd think it over and make two forms find their right position.

Thanks for your time.  

ecopsy  +  929066 Mon, 05 Oct 09 03:52 PM
Thank you, Grammar Geek, really appreciate your help.
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3616.28671. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.