We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Wed, Oct 12 2005 4:47 PM by pieanne. 6 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Riglos  +  147045 Wed, 12 Oct 05 06:10 AM

Hi everybody!

This is a very stupid sentence, like those which make us take things for granted. The first time I read this multiple choice exercise, I made my choice, then I looked at the key and changed my mind, and on second thoughts, I kept my original decision:

It's very ___________ in here. I can't hear anything.

a) noisy          b) quiet        c) exciting            d) clean

Now, my doubt lay between a) and b). At first, my obvious choice was a), and big was my surprise when I read the key showing b) as the correct one. Then I thought: "Right, you can't hear anything because there's complete silence, so it must be very quiet in there". Finally, I changed my mind and decided on a) again, for if it were b), shouldn't the sentence read: "It's very quiet in here. I don't hear anything". The modal "can" has to do with ability and possibility, which in this case are impeded by the loud noise. I think "can't here anything" is the clue here. What's your opinion?

Thanks a lot!!

Mara.

Joined on Thu, Sep 15 2005
Full Member 169
Mister Micawber  +  147050 Wed, 12 Oct 05 07:05 AM

This test question suffers from reality deprivation, and thereby plays upon our expectations.  I answered noisy at first too, because it is noisy places (where we can't hear anything else), rather than completely silent places, that we usually stumble into in real life.  Can't and don't do not affect the meaning-- it is quiet in any case, not noisy.

Joined on Wed, Aug 4 2004
Yokohama
Veteran Member 30,798
'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master-- that's all.'
Riglos  +  147054 Wed, 12 Oct 05 07:21 AM

Hi Mister Micawber!

Thanks a lot for your reply!! Now, if the sentence continued: "I can't hear anything you're saying", would only in such cases the word "noisy" do?

Thanks again!

Mara.

CalifJim  +  147062 Wed, 12 Oct 05 08:00 AM
This is a very stupid sentence

Good point!  I think it has two answers, both correct.
Joined on Mon, Aug 2 2004
California
Veteran Member 22,399
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
Anonymous, 4 yr 42 days ago

Sorry to sidestep Jim's pronouncement, but if the original sentence continued, I can't hear anything you're saying --I don't know about 'only' and 'in such cases'-- but here at least, noisy would have to be the answer.



(PS: It's me, unlogged in-- MM)

Philip  +  147210 Wed, 12 Oct 05 04:45 PM
 Mister Micawber wrote:

This test question suffers from reality deprivation, and thereby plays upon our expectations. 
Wonderful, Mike!!!!
Joined on Thu, Jun 23 2005
Veteran Member 8,737
At reise er at leve! - H. C. Andersen
pieanne  +  147211 Wed, 12 Oct 05 04:47 PM

I think that in the original sentence, "I can't hear anything" means that there's nothing to be heard. If it's "I can't hear anything you're saying", well the other person obviously says something, but his/her words cannot be heard, most probably because of the noise.

 

Joined on Thu, Jan 20 2005
South of France ...But I'm Belgian!
Veteran Member 7,517
I'm glad to help, but I'm not a native! And please excuse my typos...
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3607.32596. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.