We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Wed, May 30 2007 9:05 AM by Mister Micawber. 5 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Anonymous  +  371205 Sun, 27 May 07 04:01 PM

Hi,

Please answer these.

1. I think Mr. M used the following sentence in responding to one of the posts, and I wonder why there isn't a word like 'preposition' before the quoted word.

Why not use the usual simple "into"? 

2. I hear a lot that Whom is generally used only in very formal English and wonder which academic situtation (or non-academic situation) would  that be.

a) writing a report for a school assignment

b) writing for an academic journal

  

This is a live chat room, hosted on the chat page. You can also click here to see the chat in fullscreen.
Mister Micawber  +  371467 Mon, 28 May 07 06:44 AM

1. I think Mr. M used the following sentence (Why not use the usual simple "into"?) in responding to one of the posts, and I wonder why there isn't a word like 'preposition' before the quoted word. -- There is no need for any other word before the quoted word; it is just what it appears to be, a quoted word.  Another example:  "What does 'egregious' mean?"

2. I hear a lot that Whom is generally used only in very formal English and wonder which academic situtation (or non-academic situation) would  that be.

a) writing a report for a school assignment -- Yes

b) writing for an academic journal -- Yes

c) any kind of formal writing, i.e. excluding casual or personal correspondence.


Joined on Wed, Aug 4 2004
Yokohama
Veteran Member 30,773
'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master-- that's all.'
Anonymous, 2 yr 178 days ago

Thank you, Mr. M. For the first question, where would you say is the modification by 'the' in that sentence is taking place? 'the' must be modifying a noun, isn't it and could the quoted content be a noun? That seems improbable, to me.

What is the object of the modification for this? "-ing"?? I think a poster named "Thenativespeaker" wrote this:

Do you use "good AT" when the word that follows ends with a "-ing"?  

Mister Micawber  +  371860 Tue, 29 May 07 04:24 AM

By using the word qua word, it becomes nominalized.  Look at your own sentence:  "where would you say is the modification by 'the' (prepositional phrase, 'the' is the noun object) in that sentence is taking place? 'The' must be modifying a noun, isn't it? ('The' is the noun subject of the question)".  '-Ing' too is a noun object of 'with'-- here, a mere affix has been nominalized!


Anonymous, 2 yr 176 days ago
 Mister Micawber wrote:

By using the word qua word, it becomes nominalized.  Look at your own sentence:  "where would you say is the modification by 'the' (prepositional phrase, 'the' is the noun object) in that sentence is taking place? 'The' must be modifying a noun, isn't it? ('The' is the noun subject of the question)".  '-Ing' too is a noun object of 'with'-- here, a mere affix has been nominalized! Thank you, Mr. M. How do we know when to treat a nominalized noun as  countable and uncountable. What I have been doing so far is to treat the kinds of it as an uncountable noun. a '-ing'  or just 'ing'?


Mister Micawber  +  372462 Wed, 30 May 07 09:05 AM

You will  have to judge by context.  Are you speaking of '-ing', the omnipresent suffix, or an '-ing' which appears somewhere in the text or context?... which upon second mention becomes the '-ing'.

© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3607.32596. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.