This question has been answered · 20 replies
Forums · General English Grammar & Vocabulary, Listening & Speaking · General English Grammar Questions
Anonymous:Which is correct?
-- in two weeks time
-- in two weeks' time
Approved answer (verified by Mister Micawber)
Anonymous:time of two weeks... therefore, "in two weeks' time" is correct
MapleHow about "in two-week time"? Is it also correct and common?Neither correct nor common. Question has already been answered (twice) above.
Grammar GeekMaple, you can refer to a two-week period, or a two-week holiday, but not "in two-week time."Thanks you![C]
Anonymous:I believe it's "two weeks' time"..in Britain. However, in the US it's more common to just say "in two weeks". My public radio station broadcasts the BBC every night and it drives me crazy when they add "time" to every statement of time. It's redundant!!! "Two weeks" is a measure of time, so the Brits DON'T need to add "time" every instance that they mention a period of time.
People are waiting to help.
Live chatRegistered users can join here
Related forum topics:
Within ('in two weeks' time')?Of No Time?a week before last Friday? two weeks before...Adverbs of Time?? regarding two weeks time or two week's time?see you two weeks later?Expression: "Two weeks ago, this day, this...Two sentences?Six weeks leave applicationThey've gone/moved to Spain for two weeks.?friday two weeks ago?Two years is a long time?Time...?Isn't for Two Weeks?Two weeks' worth of work...?By the time?Two weeks time?For two weeks/ in two weeks (exam question)?Two questions