![]() Two weeks time or two weeks' time?19 replies Forums · General English Grammar & Vocabulary, Listening & Speaking · General English Grammar Questions 1 2 Anonymous: Which is correct?-- in two weeks time -- in two weeks' time Thank you! Anonymous: time of two weeks... therefore, "in two weeks' time" is correctMcJ: MapleHow about "in two-week time"? Is it also correct and common?Neither correct nor common. Question has already been answered (twice) above. New Member09 Maple, you can refer to a two-week period, or a two-week holiday, but not "in two-week time." Veteran Member26,558 ![]() ![]() ![]() Grammar GeekMaple, you can refer to a two-week period, or a two-week holiday, but not "in two-week time."Thanks you! Anonymous: Thank you)))Anonymous: I believe it's "two weeks' time"..in Britain. However, in the US it's more common to just say "in two weeks". My public radio station broadcasts the BBC every night and it drives me crazy when they add "time" to every statement of time. It's redundant!!! "Two weeks" is a measure of time, so the Brits DON'T need to add "time" every instance that they mention a period of time. Show more
| Have a question? People are waiting to help. Interesting stuff Related forum topics:Within ('in two weeks' time')?Of No Time?Confusing sentences...only two this time....?a week before last Friday? two weeks before...Adverbs of Time?? regarding two weeks time or two week's time?see you two weeks later?when - by the time?Expression: "Two weeks ago, this day, this...Two sentences?Six weeks leave applicationThey've gone/moved to Spain for two weeks.?friday two weeks ago?Two years is a long time?Time...?Isn't for Two Weeks?Two weeks' worth of work...?By the time?Two weeks time? |
Online chat is available