Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


1 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Share this topic:
Dew 2007  +  557848 Sat, 23 Aug 08 12:32 PM
South Ossetia was a part of Georgia and North Ossetia is a part of Russia. Before 1991 it din't cause any military actions. But in 1991 the former Georgian president Gamsakhurdia proclamed that Georgia is only for Georgians (like Hitler in 1941 - Germany is only for Germans) and the Georgians began to slaughter Ossetinins and Abkhasians.

Then UN provided Russian peacekeeping forces in these republics. Russia never said that it stands against these republics being a part of Georgia, though they proclaimed their independence.
But this year when the Georgians attacked the peacekeepers and Tskhinval This situation changed... Russia now stands for the INTERNATIONAL DISCUSSION of the status of these republics. But this point is not reflected in any of the UN documents proposed so far.

That's perhaps the greatest problem now. 
US spaeks of them as a part of Georgia, Russia wants to begin the international discussion of the situation.
Joined on Sun, Jun 17 2007
Russia
Contributing Member 1,352
Keep wondering!
Ruslana  +  557895 Sat, 23 Aug 08 06:39 PM
lisadove

And I need to get off this topic; I have too much else to do (;)) Wink.


Sober. Wink
Joined on Sat, Dec 17 2005
Senior Member 3,654
Cool Breeze  +  568617 Sun, 21 Sep 08 10:10 AM
Cool Breeze
“Of course there are similar examples that occurred before GWB became president. President Nixon didn't have  President Allende's human rights on his mind when Nixon ordered Allende assassinated. Augusto Pinochet, who succeeded Allende, had at least 3,500 people killed. These 3,500 people had few human rights as well. Without Nixon, they wouldn't have lost their lives.

 

There is an interesting article about the overthrow of President Allende and the recent economic growth of Chile in the September 22, 2008 issue of Newsweek. The writer, Mexico's former foreign minister and Global Distinguished Professor Jorge Castañeda of New York University correctly calls Augusto Pinochet a dictator, but does not mention the US involvement in the ousting of Allende at all. Nor does he mention that Pinochet killed 3,500 Chileans. He does mention violations of human rights under the dictator  -  there were nearly 30,000 documented cases of torture.

He manages to belittle the suffering the Chilean people had to endure by concluding that the present developments and recent reforms might not have been possible without Pinochet's authoritarian rule. I have my suspicions regarding the reasons he writes the way he does, but as I have no proof, I won't mention them.

The role of the USA can be summed up in these two Henry Kissinger quotes:

 

"The illegal we can do right now; the unconstitutional will take a little longer."'

 

"It is firm and continuing policy that [the democratically elected government of] Allende be overthrown by a coup.... We are to continue to generate maximum pressure toward this end utilizing every appropriate resource. It is imperative that these actions be implemented clandestinely and securely so that the USG [United States Government] and American hands be well hidden." October 1970 cable to CIA operatives in Chile from Henry Kissinger's "Track Two" group

CB

 

Joined on Fri, Apr 7 2006
Senior Member 3,929
"I hope you'll all live to be 150 years old - and the last voice you hear is mine!" Frank Sinatra on stage in Oslo, Norway, 28 September 1991
eyehawk001  +  760648 Mon, 01 Jun 09 09:32 PM
I am not quite sure, but i believe that US interference has been conducted since WWII. the main purposes were to indirectly occupy natural resources in other countries, for instance, Saudi Arabia has been protected by USA since WWII and to prevent other power countries to spread thier territories, for instance, USA sent troops in Afghanistan to prevent and push USSR army out during the cold war. After the cold war, none major power countries dared to fight against USA. Therefore; it was a time for USA to spread its  economic, military and political influnces. You can see how USA devides the world and how many international military bases  are on earth form the pentagon web site.  After the cold war, USA became the sole super power instead of Britain, frence, and german. In twentith first century, there are several emerging major countries, such  as China, Russia, India,and  European countries. in this era, US intervention is about global enery security, no more for political ideology.      
Joined on Mon, Jun 1 2009
New Member 01
1 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3598.39794. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.