We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!
Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cool Breeze
+
554289
Wed, 13 Aug 08 12:30 PM
Hi Young Californian I said in my previous post that the USA has done good things as well. Snuffing out Hitler was one of them. The reason modern countries - democratic and undemocratic - attempt to justify and explain their deeds is very simple: the mass media exist and information can be transmitted. Because this is possible, everybody does it. What I had in mind was the history of the USA, not so much what happened in the 20th century. The westward expansion of the USA gave a bad deal to Indians, for example. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was largely dictated to Indian leaders even though it was supposed to be voluntary. The annexation of Texas in 1845 is another example of heedless US imperialism. In the past, the great powers of the day expanded in similar fashion. As Western culture is largely a legacy of the Roman Empire, it is taken for granted in Western history books that Rome expanded by waging war against its neighbors. No one suggests that Rome had no moral right to conquer other peoples. Its military achievements are viewed with admiration rather than condemnation. This gives Westerners a clean conscience. Even though the USA was instrumental in creating the United Nations, it nowadays cares little about international law. The illegal war on Iraq is a good example of that and so are the tortured prisoners of Guantanamo. The USA praised Saddam Hussein just weeks before he attacked Kuwait. Saddam was one of America's best friends in the Middle East. That was because Iraqi oil was sold cheaply to the USA. For the same reason the US is on good terms with the ruthless dictatorial rulers of Saudi Arabia. Most of the 9/11 terrorists were Saudis, by the way. The uninitiated might wonder why the USA didn't attack Saudi Arabia instead of Iraq. After all, even the CIA must have known that Saddam Hussein and Al Queda hated each other. I am not saying that smaller nations are less guilty. Business interests dictate of lot of what they do as well. For example, Nokia, the biggest manufacturer of cell phones, has a factory in China. CB
Joined on
Fri, Apr 7 2006
Senior Member
3,970
"I hope you'll all live to be 150 years old - and the last voice you hear is mine!" Frank Sinatra on stage in Oslo, Norway, 28 September 1991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avangi
+
554497
Wed, 13 Aug 08 09:05 PM
Cool Breeze“ In the past, the great powers of the day expanded in similar fashion. As Western culture is largely a legacy of the Roman Empire, it is taken for granted in Western history books that Rome expanded by waging war against its neighbors. No one suggests that Rome had no moral right to conquer other peoples. Its military achievements are viewed with admiration rather than condemnation. This gives Westerners a clean conscience.”
Hi, CB. This seems naive. Granted, all cultures seek to control the information their children have access to, and all public school textbooks are disgustingly slanted, but anyone past the age of puberty knows, or should know, that Rome was not the first "evil empire." Judging by Young Californian's language, he didn't just fall off the turnip truck. Respectfully, - A.
Joined on
Mon, Nov 19 2007
Veteran Member
8,171
". . . le plaisir delicieux et toujours nouveau d'une occupation inutile." - Henri de Regnier
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cool Breeze
+
554503
Wed, 13 Aug 08 09:27 PM
Avangi“ anyone past the age of puberty knows, or should know, that Rome was not the first "evil empire." ” Hi Avangi I never said Rome was the first evil empire. I didn't use the term at all. I just said it waged unjustified wars. Of course it wasn't the first empire to do that. CB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RayH
+
554506
Wed, 13 Aug 08 09:38 PM
Cool Breeze“Even though the USA was instrumental in creating the United Nations, it nowadays cares little about international law. The illegal war on Iraq is a good example”
Just a few quotes from UN Resolution 1441 (2002) (emphasis added): Deploring the fact that Iraq has not provided an accurate, full, final, and complete disclosure, as required by resolution 687 (1991), of all aspects of its programmes to develop weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles with a range greater than one hundred and fifty kilometres Recalling that its resolution 678 (1990) authorized Member States to use all necessary means to uphold and implement its resolution 660Recognizing the threat Iraq’s non-compliance with Council resolutions and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and long-range missiles poses to international peace and security, Read the whole thing here: http://www.casi.org.uk/info/undocs/scres/2002/res1441e.pdfSo, given the above perhaps you would care to say specifically what is illegal about the Iraq war and the U. S. involvement in it.
Joined on
Sat, Mar 22 2008
Contributing Member
1,555
Native speaker of U. S. English. Not a grammar expert.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RayH
+
554509
Wed, 13 Aug 08 09:49 PM
Cool Breeze“the tortured prisoners of Guantanamo”
Perhaps you would care to explain how this constitutes torture: A former driver for Osama bin Laden was sentenced by a military jury Thursday to 5 1/2 years in prison for supporting terrorism, a far shorter term than demanded by government prosecutors. The judge gave Salim Ahmed Hamdan credit for five years and one month of his pretrial incarceration at Guantanamo Bay, making him eligible for release from custody in five months. While you're at it maybe you would be good enough to state your precise definition of "torture."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cool Breeze
+
554515
Wed, 13 Aug 08 09:59 PM
RayH“ So, given the above perhaps you would care to say specifically what is illegal about the Iraq war and the U. S. involvement in it. ” The United Nations didn't authorize the war. The United States didn't have the UN's permission to start the war. CB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cool Breeze
+
554523
Wed, 13 Aug 08 10:08 PM
RayH“ Perhaps you would care to explain how this constitutes torture: A former driver for Osama bin Laden was sentenced by a military jury Thursday to 5 1/2 years in prison for supporting terrorism, a far shorter term than demanded by government prosecutors. The judge gave Salim Ahmed Hamdan credit for five years and one month of his pretrial incarceration at Guantanamo Bay, making him eligible for release from custody in five months. While you're at it maybe you would be good enough to state your precise definition of "torture." ” I never said Osama bin Laden's driver was tortured! I don't follow your logic at all. If I say there has been torture in Guantanamo, I don't mean everybody has been tortured there. I cannot possibly know if this driver was tortured or not. A Swedish prisoner who was released without being charged with anything wrote a book about his experiences in Guantanamo. Unfortunately I didn't write down his name when that happened. Some others that have been released have also mentioned that they were tortured in Guantanamo. Webster's dictionary defines 'torture' as follows: 1. the act of inflicting excruciating pain, as punishment or revenge, as a means of getting a confession or information, or for sheer cruelty. 2. a method of inflicting such pain. CB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avangi
+
554526
Wed, 13 Aug 08 10:18 PM
Cool Breeze“ I never said Rome was the first evil empire. I didn't use the term at all. I just said it waged unjustified wars. Of course it wasn't the first empire to do that. ”
Sorry for the misunderstanding. I thought your point was, nobody in western civilization questions the morality of the Roman conquests, because history is written from "their" point of view. And therefore as westerners we take the view that conquest by a western power is always for the benefit of mankind. I know this is absurd, but it sounded to me as if this is what you were saying. I'm glad you cleared it up. "Evil empire" was a bad choice of terms on my part. I meant to say that students (even in the west) now know that the world did not begin with Romulus and Remus, and in fact don't view world affairs in terms of western tradition. I believe that "evil empire" was coined by one of Bush's writers. I assumed everyone would take it (as I do) for a childish expression. Bad joke, sorry. (Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe it goes back to Reagan.) Thanks, - A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodman
+
554537
Wed, 13 Aug 08 11:17 PM
While being a spectator of this exchange, I couldn’t help suppressing this urge but add a few words. Before doing so, I feel the need to disclose that I am not a native American, so the view I am about to express is solely mine as a personal observation and belief. Whether the Iraq war a resolution passed by the U.N. or whether it was carried out based on, like some said, “the greed for oil”. The need to eradicate Saddam who was proven to be a danger to it’s oil-rich neighbor was brewing. As the most oil-dependent country in the world, United States could not afford to seat idling by while Iran and Iraq were trying to gobble up each other, and perhaps their neighbors. Was the intervention necessary? Well, if you are a person with liberal view, I bet my last dollar in my pocket that you say “no”. Is it for oil ? I’ll say “not likely”. Otherwise, why were we paying close to $5 a gallon up till 4 weeks ago? In fact, we might as well make it a war for oil and demand the Iraqis to pay for the military costs which is into the trillion mark which we, our children and grandchildren will be paying for it for decades! There is no perfect country in the world if we want to scrutinize every aspect in the “human spectrum”. United States has been what some called “the policy of the world” which in some ways true. If we looked back to recent history of the past 60 years, the world as we know it may look very different without the U.S. intervention. The map of the world would have been very different. If not for the U.S.’s ultimate decision to drop the two nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki on that faithful August day in 1945 as a retaliation for the Pearl Harbor attack, the Japanese Imperial Army would have swept through and occupied China. No one would agree that was a good decision from the humanitarian point of view. War is never humanitarian. But without war, demons disguised as leaders would have suppressed a large portion of the world’s population. We need to wrap up the Iraq war, either to pull our troops like a beaten dog, or finish the war in the way a war should be fought. If we tie one hand of our soldiers behind their back and require them to consult to the rule book whether they should open fire on an approaching enemy, and treat the detainees in Guantanamo bay like our honored guests, the western civilization as we know it will soon become the past, back to the fourteenth century.
Joined on
Mon, Nov 7 2005
Senior Member
3,816
The name says it all!
|
|
|
|
|
|