We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Answered
1 verified answer
Latest post Tue, Apr 21 2009 12:30 AM by Feathers. 5 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Feathers  +  699238 Mon, 20 Apr 09 12:27 AM
Dear all,


I have two questions of the same kind. Instead of ...


#1. The target is set to 1,000 units per month.

#2. The annual total production is estimated to be 12,000 units.


... using these sentences (and I believe these are correct), could I use:


#1'. The target is set as 1,000 units per month.

#2'. The annual total production is estimated as 12,000 units.


?? How do you think of this use of "as"?


Many, many thanks, as always!

Best answer by Clive  +  699317 Mon, 20 Apr 09 05:09 AM
Hi,

I have two questions of the same kind. Instead of ...

 

 

#1. The target is set to 1,000 units per month.

This is not wrong, but more often you'd hear

The target has been set at 1,000 units per month.

The target is 1,000 units per month.

 

#2. The annual total production is estimated to be 12,000 units.

 This is not wrong, but more often you'd hear

The total annual production is estimated as 144,000 units.

For the next year, the total monthly production is estimated as 12,000 units.

 

Best wishes, Clive

 

 

All the other replies..
metal.carratt  suggested by malojaszu  +  699254 Mon, 20 Apr 09 01:10 AM
I would think 'at' sounds better. 
Joined on Thu, Feb 26 2009
Gwangju, South Korea
New Member 20
malojaszu  suggested by malojaszu  +  699257 Mon, 20 Apr 09 01:36 AM
I agree with metalcarret.

"at" 1000 units sounds most correct.

Joined on Mon, Apr 20 2009
New Member 05
Wszystko pozadku!
Feathers  +  699265 Mon, 20 Apr 09 02:10 AM
Hi metal.carratt and malojaszu, thanks a lot for your suggestion. Yep, you are right -- after googling I find the most common collocation is "be set at...", seems like.Thank you both!


Still.. I might still want to use "is set to .." in my sentence (if it sounds acceptable) because what I actually wanted to say is "The monthly target is set (closer) to 1,000 unit level in the first quarter" or something like that. Does that make sense...?


I might prefer "is estimated to be", not "is estimated at" in the second sentence, too. The full sentence is "According to the latest forecast, the total production number of 2009 is estimated to be 12,000 units".


So.. "as" in these sentences seems to be a bad choice. I just wanted to know how it sounds to others, and if it does sound wrong, why it is wrong. Any ideas? I appreciate any comments.


Feathers  +  699605 Tue, 21 Apr 09 12:30 AM
Clive, I don't know how to thank you, really. Googling and my dictionaries didn't help me much when it comes to the question whether these collocations are OK/acceptable/rare/wrong.


I am sure I will have another chance to use these expressions in the near future, and I promise you to use your versions :))) "The total annual" sounds better than "the annual total', huh...! It is really good to know!


Thank you again, Clive :)))

© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3607.32596. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.