We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Wed, Nov 16 2005 10:05 AM by Anonymous. 6 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
LeicesterLad  +  138456 Sat, 17 Sep 05 02:00 PM

I read in an archived thread recently that it is incorrect to use an apostrophe with the third-person neuter pronoun (ie "it") to imply possesion.

In other words, you shouldn't say - of a cat for example:

"It's fur is shiny and black"

Is this correct?  If so, how then does one imply possesion for an object/animal/person when it has no gender or the gender is not known?

Does one have to use the more cumbersome:  "The cat's fur is shiny and black" every time - even if the words "The cat" were used in the previous - or even the same - sentence?

 

Joined on Fri, Sep 16 2005
N E England (Orig from Leicester)
Junior Member 81
Clive  +  138459 Sat, 17 Sep 05 02:14 PM

Hi,

Welcome to the Forum.

Just say Its fur is shiny and black. Its is a possessive adjective.

Best wishes, Clive

Joined on Thu, Oct 28 2004
Canada
Veteran Member 29,592
El tango argentino es un pensamiento triste que se puede bailar (The tango argentino is a sad thought which can be danced) Enrique Santos Discépolo
LeicesterLad  +  138460 Sat, 17 Sep 05 02:26 PM

Thankyou Clive!

I didn't know this.  I've been writing it incorrectly all my life!

It does seem a little inconsistent though.  Surely it would make sense to use the apostrophe universally to imply possesion, whatever or whoever the "possessor"

eg

Clives's hat

London's buildings

It's nest

etc.....

Does anyone know why "its" is different?

thanks,

Matt

Forbes  +  138485 Sat, 17 Sep 05 03:53 PM

 LeicesterLad wrote:
It does seem a little inconsistent though.  Surely it would make sense to use the apostrophe universally to imply possesion, whatever or whoever the "possessor"

I used to think this when I was first taught about the possessive 's'. Apparently it was at one time common to write "It's nest". I suspect the difference arose to distinguish it from it's meaning it is or it has.

Joined on Thu, Jun 16 2005
Regular Member 895
pieanne  +  138494 Sat, 17 Sep 05 04:07 PM

The possessive adjectives don't take the genitive " 's ". Only the nouns take it.

 

Joined on Thu, Jan 20 2005
South of France ...But I'm Belgian!
Veteran Member 7,517
I'm glad to help, but I'm not a native! And please excuse my typos...
MrPedantic  +  138664 Sun, 18 Sep 05 12:06 AM
 Forbes wrote:

 LeicesterLad wrote:
It does seem a little inconsistent though.  Surely it would make sense to use the apostrophe universally to imply possesion, whatever or whoever the "possessor"

I used to think this when I was first taught about the possessive 's'. Apparently it was at one time common to write "It's nest". I suspect the difference arose to distinguish it from it's meaning it is or it has.

Yes; its seems to have become the norm in the early 19th century. Before that, it's for the possessive pronoun was common enough.

You find it's in editions of Jane Austen's works that preserve the original spelling (along with e.g. surprize, shew).

MrP

Joined on Tue, Oct 12 2004
Veteran Member 12,592
...opella forensis / adducit febris...
Anonymous, 4 yr 7 days ago
"It's" is the contraction of "it is."
 
"Its" is the third-person neuter possessive adjective, the equivalent of "his" and "her."

So, "Its fur is black," and Bob's your uncle.
 
Joe in France

"Language changes with use, but changes that diminish the power of the language to make distinctions should be avoided."
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3607.32596. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.