We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


1 2 3 4 5 6
Share this topic:
Orpheus  +  1452 Sun, 29 Jun 03 03:09 AM
I think there are exceptions, and those two are some of the exceptions. According to Michael Swan in Practical English Usage, sometimes we add an apostrophe to a singular noun ending in 's' in older and foreign names. But just sometimes, Dickens is still written Dickens's novels. Tough question, Maj.
Joined on Tue, Jun 17 2003
Jakarta, Indonesia
Regular Member 587
'Truth is Subjectivity' - Kierkegaard
Jacko  +  1454 Sun, 29 Jun 03 04:48 AM
I am not entirely sure, but I guess it would be Cervantes's, Don Quixote's, or Socrates's ideas. You can also remove the 's from Cervantes's and Socrates's.

The rule is if the non is singular and ends in s, then you should add 's. But if it will sound awkward, then you may choose to omit it. Either one is acceptable.
Joined on Fri, Jun 20 2003
Full Member 215
...Ad Space For Sale... Contact St. Nick for Details
Jacko  +  1455 Sun, 29 Jun 03 04:53 AM
Also about the nouns, that would be called joint possession. If two nouns jointly own a possession, then you add 's to the last noun. If two nouns have individual possession of the noun, then you add 's to both. (I said 's, but you should use ' whenever necessary).

Example.

Adam and Eve's garden.
It is either Adam's or Eve's decision.

In the first sentence, Adam and Eve co-own the garden. While in the second sentence, Adam doesn't own Eve's decision, nor Eve does own Adam's decision.
Orpheus  +  1478 Sun, 29 Jun 03 11:02 AM
I think I didn't say it clearly. What I meant is Socrates' is the common way to write it and it's just one of many exceptions.
moijelesuis  +  4562 Sat, 16 Aug 03 12:19 PM
then there is the surname James. if Mr. and Mrs. James James (or Robert James, if you prefer) invited people to their home, the invited guests could say, "we are headed over to the Jameses for cocktails." (here it is a plural, not a possessive!)
Joined on Sat, Aug 16 2003
usa/canada
Full Member 116
kitkattail  +  4598 Sat, 16 Aug 03 05:57 PM
You know, getting back to the original question, if it is a family-owned business, then isn't there more than one Harper after all?
Joined on Tue, Aug 12 2003
Toronto
Full Member 400
www.kitkattail.blogspot.com
hitchhiker  +  4689 Sun, 17 Aug 03 06:10 AM
Then it would be "the Harpers' bar" - In this case, Harper was given as the name, like the name of a grandfather or something.. John Harper's bar etc..
Joined on Mon, Nov 18 2002
Richmond, UK
Senior Member 4,034
Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea - massive, difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind-boggling amounts of excrement...
Guest, 5 yr 337 days ago
How about a last name being used to end a letter or invitation (i.e. last name of Smith). Is it The Smiths, The Smith's, or The Smiths'?
Guest, 5 yr 275 days ago
It'd be "The Smiths"
1 2 3 4 5 6
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3607.32596. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.