Using "could" making a question

   Share on Facebook  
Viceidol  #484223  Mon, 03 Mar 08 12:36 AM

It could rain tomorrow.

What is the question and negative sentences of the above sentence?

* question sentence: Could it rain tomorrow?

* negative sentence: It couldn't rain tomorrow.

Are they really the question and negative sentences of " It could rain tomorrow."?

Thank you for your help!

 

  
Top 150 Contributor
Joined on Wed, Jul 11 2007
Taiwan
Regular Member (535)
[ad priority="6"] [/ad]
Clive  #484228  Mon, 03 Mar 08 12:57 AM

Hi,

Seems reasonable to me.

Clive

  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Thu, Oct 28 2004
Canada
Veteran Member (22,193)
ModeratorTeachers
El tango argentino es un pensamiento triste que se puede bailar (The tango argentino is a sad thought which can be danced) Enrique Santos Discépolo
Anonymous  #484266  Mon, 03 Mar 08 04:16 AM
It could rain tomorrow. means that it is possible that it will rain.  The modal verb 'could' expresses possibility.

 The negative would normally be expressed by "It couldn't possibly rain tomorrow." (we're in the desert!)  or "It's not possible that it will rain tomorrow." (we've had rain for 40 days and 40 nights, and it's ludicrous to add on another day of rain!)  or by the opinion, "I don't think it will rain tomorrow."

 So, the sentence, "It could rain tomorrow." means "It is possible that it will rain."

Therefore, the question, "Is it possible for it to rain tomorrow?" and the negative, "It is not possible that it will rain tomorrow." are not so common, and therefore, sound odd.

 

V.C. 

  
Teo  #484268  Mon, 03 Mar 08 04:29 AM

It may/might/could rain tomorrow. (acceptable)

It can rain tomorrow. (not acceptable)

Could it rain tomorrow? (acceptable)

It couldn't rain tomorrow. (acceptable)

What about the acceptability of the following sentences?

1. May it rain tomorrow?

2. Might it rain tomorrow?

3. Can it rain tomorrow?

4. It may not rain tomorrow.

5. It might not rain tomorrow.

6. It cannot rain tomorrow.

  
Top 75 Contributor
Joined on Tue, Sep 28 2004
Taiwan
Contributing Member (1,630)
Thank you very much for your reply.
Fandorin  #484683  Mon, 03 Mar 08 09:41 PM

As I can see the verb "could" is being used  when the possibility of event is hardly probable (comparing with may/might) and this is reffered to the present and future. Of course it isn't just one possibility of using that.  Am I right?

  
Top 150 Contributor
Joined on Thu, Dec 20 2007
Russia
Full Member (457)
Whatever happens, be yourself.
CalifJim  #484711  Mon, 03 Mar 08 11:24 PM
 
Fandorin
the verb "could" is being used  when the possibility of event is hardly probable (comparing with may/might)
No.  may, might, and could are all used as It is possible that.  The probability is simply non-zero for all three.

It may rain.  =  It is possible that it will rain.

It might rain.  =  It is possible that it will rain.

It could rain.  =  It is possible that it will rain.

See Re: May/might, can/could, shall/should, must/have to, will/would - when to use what?

CJ 

  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Mon, Aug 2 2004
California
Veteran Member (17,566)
ModeratorProficient Speaker
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
CalifJim  #484714  Mon, 03 Mar 08 11:39 PM
Teo

What about the acceptability of the following sentences?

1. May it rain tomorrow?

2. Might it rain tomorrow?

3. Can it rain tomorrow?

4. It may not rain tomorrow.

5. It might not rain tomorrow.

6. It cannot rain tomorrow.

1. not acceptable.  'may'  in a question suggests a request for permission -- not appropriate for rain.

2. acceptable.

3. acceptable.

4. acceptable.

5. acceptable.

6. acceptable. 

CJ 

  
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL General English Grammar Questions
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions & Terms of Service