verbal

1 2 3 4 5
   Share on Facebook  
Inchoateknowledge  #249536  Thu, 27 Jul 06 08:23 PM
I will take you up on your words.
"I've never seen things like 'must not have contained' in any grammar book." Buy a decent book then.
'Must have been' exists so its negation: must not have been exists too. Replace the word "been" for "contained".
Before you give up English revise conditionals.
As regards verbals (not verbs):
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/grammar/g_verbals.html

  
Top 50 Contributor
Joined on Wed, May 3 2006
Senior Member (2,528)
Beep! Beep! :)
Pastsimple  #249538  Thu, 27 Jul 06 08:34 PM
I'm hesitating between Dutch and Swedish Wink [;)]. Or perhaps your mother tongue?

I have an idea: the one who's not right will take up the mother tongue of the one who's right? What do you say?

You say: At least one of the three sentences is 100% correct.
I say: None of the three sentences is 100% correct.

Is that it?
  
Top 200 Contributor
Joined on Thu, Feb 16 2006
Czech Republic, Europe
Full Member (303)
If you are a native speaker and find any grammar or stylistic mistakes in my posts, don't hesitate to tell me! I will really appreciate that.
Inchoateknowledge  #249540  Thu, 27 Jul 06 08:36 PM
jag prata pa svensk en lite.
  
Pastsimple  #249541  Thu, 27 Jul 06 08:38 PM
Hey, wait a minute, you are a Swede? Wink [;)]
  
Inchoateknowledge  #249547  Thu, 27 Jul 06 08:49 PM
I am going to prove you that this sentence is correct:

What would you have said verbals are if you had been allowed to say only one sentence and this sentence must not have contained the words: participle, gerund, infinitive?

This is called third conditional.
Would have + past participle; if + past perfect

My sentence definitely follows this rule.
If you do not think so, I am sorry for you.
must not have contained = it was necessary that the explanation did not not contain the words.
Do you still have doubts?






 
  
Inchoateknowledge  #249549  Thu, 27 Jul 06 08:53 PM
 Pastsimple wrote:
Hey, wait a minute, you are a Swede? Wink [;)]


I have cousins living there.

I is the subject

have is the verb

living there is an adjectival phrase.



  
Maple  #249550  Thu, 27 Jul 06 08:55 PM

Hi!, I've known why you asked the question,  the definion of verbals should be:

words formed from verbs that take on the function of nouns and adjectives.

  
Top 75 Contributor
Joined on Tue, Jul 11 2006
An ESL student in China
Contributing Member (1,110)
Pastsimple  #249555  Thu, 27 Jul 06 08:58 PM
 Inchoateknowledge wrote:
I am going to prove you that this sentence is correct:

What would you have said verbals are if you had been allowed to say only one sentence and this sentence must not have contained the words: participle, gerund, infinitive?

This is called third conditional.
Would have + past participle; if + past perfect

My sentence definitely follows this rule.
If you do not think so, I am sorry for you.
must not have contained = it was necessary that the explanation did not not contain the words.
Do you still have doubts?




I do. Must not have contained is not the past perfect tense of mustn't contain. It isn't the past tense of mustn't contain either - in case you'd like to speak about the second conditional. Wink [;)]
  
Inchoateknowledge  #249556  Thu, 27 Jul 06 08:58 PM
Definitely, Maple.



  
1 2 3 4 5
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL General English Grammar Questions
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions & Terms of Service