[title]Family quotes[/title] [description]Welcome to our family quotes section! Here you'll find some of the funniest (and wisest) quotes on the subject of family life![/description]
Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


1 2
Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Sat, Jan 31 2009 6:02 PM by Zerox. 11 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Kooyeen  +  376902 Sat, 09 Jun 07 01:08 AM
Hi,
Americans use different intonation for vowel sounds in one-syllable words, according to the final consonant (whether it is voiced or unvoiced). Examples:

Bit - Bid (the vowel in "bid" sounds different, it is on two levels of intonation)
niece - knees (the vowel in "knees" is on two levels)
cot - cod (the vowel in "cod" is on two levels)
boot - mood (the vowel in "mood" is on two levels)
...and so on


1) Do all Americans do that? Most of them? Are there dialects that don't do that? What about other dialects (UK, etc.)?
2) Does that only happen in one-syllable words? I think it applies to every stressed syllable, but not only in one-syllable words.

Thanks Smile [:)]

Joined on Thu, Dec 22 2005
Italy
Senior Member 4,981
Parental Advisory / Explicit Posts
Marvin A.  +  376925 Sat, 09 Jun 07 04:25 AM
I don't think it's called intonation.  It's allophonic vowel length: vowel phonemes are realized as longer vowel allophones before voiced consonant phonemes in the coda of a syllable.  This is found in all dialects of American English.  Some American dialects have some phonemic vowel distinctions as well, but this is less common.  Australian English has a distinctive phonemic vowel length: pairs such as ferry/fairy; hut/heart; and bid/beard are distinguished solely by vowel length.

Joined on Fri, Dec 8 2006
Regular Member 638
Kooyeen  +  377154 Sat, 09 Jun 07 05:46 PM
Hi Marvin,
thanks. Yeah, maybe I should call it "vowel length". It's just that those vowels are on two different levels of intonation (=pitch), so...

But I tend to use long vowels where I shouldn't use them. I don't think I tend to use short vowels instead of long vowels, but I I think I tend to do the other way around. In other words, I tend to say:
got with the same vowel in god
but with the same vowel in bud
etc.

What do you think?


Marvin A.  +  377229 Sat, 09 Jun 07 11:24 PM
>> It's just that those vowels are on two different levels of intonation (=pitch) <<

?? How so?

>> But I tend to use long vowels where I shouldn't use them. <<
Well, since it's allophonic, it really makes no difference.  It might add to the impression of a foreign accent, but incorrect vowel length in English is not so noticeable.  As long as you get the tense-lax distinctions down, then all's well.

Also, note that short tense vowels are about the same length as long lax ones: so bid and beat have about the same length.
Kooyeen  +  377502 Sun, 10 Jun 07 05:14 PM

 Marvin A. wrote:

As long as you get the tense-lax distinctions down, then all's well.

Do you mean, as long as I don't merge "did" and "deed", "bad" and "bad", like Italians do?
 Marvin A. wrote:
>> It's just that those vowels are on two different levels of intonation (=pitch) <<

?? How so?


It is diffucult to explain... I made this drawing

genevrier45  +  656981 Thu, 29 Jan 09 08:32 AM
I have newly joined this forum, just to give a reply to you.

I know what you were expressing,
and in fact a voiced consonant always sounds lower pitch than the vowels (also unv. consonant, unv. consonant always seems to have a high pitch though it doesn't voiced).

But in terms of pronunciation the pitches may not be the difference.
The pitch of voiced consonant is low because the voicing of a voiced consonant in coda position is different to that of a vowel, it is more tough,
so the pitch drops at the coda position when you are pronouncing "cod".

But all in all, the factors of vowel length and tenseness are much obvious in distinguishing the pairs like "cod" vs "cot".
Joined on Thu, Jan 29 2009
Hong Kong
New Member 04
CalifJim  +  657781 Fri, 30 Jan 09 06:05 AM

Kooyeen
“Do all Americans do that?”
Frankly, I can't picture mentally exactly what you're talking about.

If I say the vowel in bid any differently than the vowel in bit, I am not aware of it.  (That doesn't mean I don't say them differently.)

CJ
Joined on Mon, Aug 2 2004
California
Veteran Member 22,458
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
Zerox  +  657927 Fri, 30 Jan 09 10:00 AM
I think the terms you are looking for are called 'vowel length' and 'vowel duration'. As it has been mentioned, vowels before fortis sounds tend to be shorter because the fortis sound needs more power, that is, it is aspirated. Now, vowel length is a phenomenon in which different vowels are placed in the same phonetic environment (minimal pairs: /pit/ vs. /pi:t/), whereas vowel duration refers to the exact amount of time the same vowel lasts in different environments ( change of a fortis consonant to its lenis counterpart, for example).

Obviously, the differences in duration are hard to notice by ear, but they still affect one's pronunciation. These three examples should expound the difference with the vowel sound:

Car
Card
Cart

From top to bottom, you can give a 'time duration' for each vowel in each case, as in 2 for car, 1.5 for card and 1 for cart. Now, the numbers are only representative, they are not exact. By reading them alone, you should feel how the vowel feels shorter and shorter in the bottom.
Joined on Wed, May 10 2006
Full Member 295
-It is rational that the irrational contradicts with the rational-
Pter  +  658139 Fri, 30 Jan 09 03:18 PM
Hi Kooyeen,

I think I know what you mean and I am also interested in the answer. Are you referring to the staircase intonation mentioned in Ann Cook's AAT?

My mother tongue is a tonal langauge (a different tone stands for a different word) and there's no difficulty for me to notice the change of tone (or pitch) in the long vowels in English. I read from another book that English is an intonation language (the pitch of the voice is used syntactically) and the pattern of intonation is very flexible.  My guess is that the tone change in the long vowels is so smooth and flexible that it blends into the intonation of the whole sentence and that's why it may be difficult for a native speaker of English to understand what you mean.  Or perhaps, the staircase intonation mentioned by Ann Cook is only used by some Americans or only under certain situations.  I don't know.


Joined on Wed, Nov 28 2007
Regular Member 553
1 2
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3616.28671. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.