[title]Family quotes[/title] [description]Welcome to our family quotes section! Here you'll find some of the funniest (and wisest) quotes on the subject of family life![/description]
Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This is a discussion thread.
Latest post Mon, Dec 19 2005 10:07 PM by Lazarus. 2 replies.
| |
Anonymous  +  161918 Wed, 23 Nov 05 08:56 PM

Hi everyone.  I know that this issue can be very debateable, but not many people know the truth behind the war.  I find that this may change our views on how our nation is being run.

   ~  We went to war with Iraq because of the threat of WMDs (weapons of mass destruction) being created.  There were also threats and rumors that thy would be used in the future.

   ~   President Bush told Saddam to let the U.K. in Iraq and search for weapons.

   ~   Saddam did not allow them to enter.

   ~   Back in the U.S., Bush was recieving information about where the weapons were being held.  He said that the information was correct and has been checked several times.

   ~   Since Saddam didn't comply with the deadline to allow the search to continue, so we went to war. 

   ~   We went in there with one mission, to find Saddam and the weapons storage.  After some time, many lost lives of both civilians and soldiers,  Saddam was captured in an underground bunker.  As far as the weapons, none were found yet. 

   ~   Saddam was questioned and then taken prisoner.  No weapons were found.   The search continues.

   ~    Sometime in 2004, a year after the war started ( March 19, 2003), Bush finally admits that there were no weapons found and that he had been given false information.   The reason for going to war now is because Saddam posed a threat.  Nothing more than a threat.

To this day the war is still going on, lives are lost everyday. Iraq is closer to democracy, but has many years to go.  I have just one question.  Everytime the U.S. sees a nation that poses a threat, will we go in there and take them out?  Please reply to this.  I will be so greatful. 

          *  If at anytime someone was offened by a statement I have made, it wasn't ment to offend you.  I just wanted to know what others thought about this topic.  *

Ultimatewaters  +  171218 Sun, 18 Dec 05 09:23 AM
lol i can put the reason why in one word: OIL
do you think usa even knew where iraque was if it wasnt for oilSmile [:)]Smile [:)]

Joined on Sun, Dec 18 2005
somewhere under the rainbow
New Member 18
im a fifteen year old girl, want to learn more peeps all over the world and their way of living and stuff!! hugs, emily my dad works for an international company and we move...
Lazarus  +  171975 Mon, 19 Dec 05 10:07 PM
 Ultimatewaters wrote:
lol i can put the reason why in one word: OIL
do you think usa even knew where iraque was if it wasnt for oilSmile [:)]Smile [:)]



I actually felt better back when I figured it was just about oil.  Since that time, I've started thinking that it is about something far worse. 

Lazarus
Joined on Wed, Sep 28 2005
U.S.
Full Member 285
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3616.28671. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.