was to come / did come / came

   Share on Facebook  
Janissary  #188737  Wed, 25 Jan 06 09:26 PM

gertrude was to come with us.

why the writer uses it in this way(it is in the book which i am reading now) . what is the difference "

gertrude was to come with us.

"

"gerturude came with us"

  
Top 150 Contributor
Joined on Mon, Jan 23 2006
Istanbul
Full Member (494)
speak english or die
This is a live chat room, hosted on the chat page. You can also click here to see the chat in fullscreen.
nona the brit  #188750  Wed, 25 Jan 06 10:18 PM

Gertrude came with us means that it has already happened. Gertrude went somewhere with them.

Gertrude 'was to' come with us means that it has been arranged that Gertrude would go somewhere with them in the future. The emphasis though, is on the fact that they are taking Gertrude, and it suggests they are making arrangements/looking after her, rather than Gertrude just happening to be in their party.

  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Wed, Sep 22 2004
England
Veteran Member (11,430)
ModeratorProficient Speaker
The name says it all.
Janissary  #188784  Wed, 25 Jan 06 11:36 PM

does it mean she didnt come.i mean is it  precise. if it is so can we use she was going to come with us

  
CalifJim  #188875  Thu, 26 Jan 06 07:29 AM
If Gertrude was to come, it doesn't mean she came and it doesn't mean she didn't come.  It means only that it had been arranged previously that she would come.  We don't know what happened next until we read the rest of the story.  Maybe she was to come, but she got sick at the last minute and did not come.  Maybe she was to come, so everybody waited longer until she finally came, precisely because they knew she was to come.

CJ

  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Mon, Aug 2 2004
California
Veteran Member (17,512)
ModeratorProficient Speaker
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
Janissary  #188911  Thu, 26 Jan 06 10:11 AM
hmm. so this is not the same thing as was/were going to do" ok understand thnx Smile [:)]
  
CalifJim  #189236  Fri, 27 Jan 06 03:40 AM
That's right.  It is similar, but not exactly the same as "was/were going to".

Often you can add the word "expected", "supposed", or "scheduled" like this:

Gertrude was to come. 
=  Gertrude was expected to come.
=  Gertrude was supposed to come.
=  Gertrude was scheduled to come.

(where the = indicates approximate equality, not exact equality.)

CJ

  
Janissary  #200254  Thu, 23 Feb 06 06:12 PM

thnx for all explanation , firstly.

as far as what i have understood from you , it means it is expected to do so.

but today i get confused with sth again that likes this.this is the sentence

"if we are to look behind the mere facts of behaviour for an explanation of this phonemenon."

why it is not in such a way " if we look behind the mere.. ......."

or " if we are going to look.."

or sth else. i cant find a common point with "was to do sth"

has it a relevance with expectations?

regards

  
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL Basic English Grammar Questions and Help
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions & Terms of Service