[title]Family quotes[/title] [description]Welcome to our family quotes section! Here you'll find some of the funniest (and wisest) quotes on the subject of family life![/description]
Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Wed, Aug 20 2008 3:30 AM by mubrik88. 2 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
mubrik88  +  556706 Wed, 20 Aug 08 12:49 AM

He,

Could you please help me?

What is the deference between these sentences ?


She went to Cambridge.

She has been to Cambridge.

She was in Cambridge.

 

Thank you.

Joined on Sat, Aug 9 2008
Full Member 101
YoungCalifornian  +  556715 Wed, 20 Aug 08 01:30 AM
She went to Cambridge.

Went is the past tense of go.  If you "go to" a school, it usually means you attend there as a student.

She has been to Cambridge.

Been is the past participle of be.  The sentence literally means that at some point in the past she was at Cambridge, but not necessarilly that she was enrolled as a student.  The usage of the past participle as opposed to the preterite also implies that there is a meaning or reason she was there that is relevant to the present.

She was in Cambridge.

Was is the past tense of be.  It simply means that she was there is the past.  Also, the use of the preposition "in" means that she was in the town of Cambridge.  If you mean the univerisity, use the preposition "at" instead.  Generally you don't say that you are "in" universities.


To sum up, the verb "to be" in reference to a university means that the subject is simply present at the university.  To indicate that the subject is a present there as a student, one should use "to go to" or "to attend."  The usage of the past participle (be=been, go=gone) in this context (i.e. perfect aspect) indicates a past action with direct relevance to the present.
Joined on Mon, Feb 14 2005
Los Angeles, California
Regular Member 586
mubrik88, 1 yr 99 days ago
Now I understand (:)) Smile
Thanks very much..
This is  a great explanation (Y) Yes(Y) Yes

Best regards
(F) Rose

© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3616.28671. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.