Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Mon, Oct 2 2006 9:26 AM by milky. 2 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
milky  +  274686 Sat, 30 Sep 06 10:26 PM

Facchinetti has said that "just because two modals are interchangeable in a specific context does not mean that they are strictly equivalent. This means that what difference there is between them does not affect the meaning of the utterance to the point that it means something altogether different and may therefore cause misunderstanding".

Modality in Contemporary English, pg 82.

Joined on Thu, Jan 15 2004
Senior Member 3,149
Hume said that if we had perfect or complete descriptive knowledge of reality, we could not, by reasoning, derive a single valid "ought".
CalifJim  +  275210 Mon, 02 Oct 06 08:19 AM
I suppose she [might/could] be right.

CJ
Joined on Mon, Aug 2 2004
California
Veteran Member 22,128
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
milky, 3 yr 38 days ago
Undoubtedly.
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3598.39794. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.