1 2 3 4 5 6

Where is the direct object...?

This question has no verified answers · 45 replies
Anonymous:
Where is the direct object in the transitive sentence below?

"These agents are trained to kill."
:
Hi,

Where is the direct object in the transitive sentence below?

"These agents are trained to kill

There isn't one. It's not a transitive sentence. Consider 'The window is broken'.

best wishes, Clive
Canada
Veteran Member 52,398
El tango argentino es un pensamiento triste que se puede bailar (The tango argentino is a sad thought which can be danced) Enrique Santos Discépolo
See also:
:


Hi,

Where is the direct object in the transitive sentence below?

"These agents are trained to kill

There isn't one. It's not a transitive sentence. Consider 'The window is broken'.

best wishes, Clive

It is an objectless transitive, Clive.

Similar examples:

Eve insisted: Adam ate.

Orson Welles ate, drank and smoked too much.
Senior Member 3,149
Hume said that if we had perfect or complete descriptive knowledge of reality, we could not, by reasoning, derive a single valid "ought".
:


Where is the direct object in the transitive sentence below?

"These agents are trained to kill."

It's an objectless transitive.
Senior Member 3,149
Hume said that if we had perfect or complete descriptive knowledge of reality, we could not, by reasoning, derive a single valid "ought".
:
There is no such thing as a transitive sentence.

Verbs are transitive or intransitive, not sentences.

"to train" is a transitive verb. As such, it can be used both in active and in passive sentences.

The sample sentence illustrates a transitive verb used in a passive sentence (i.e., a sentence in the passive voice).
In the active counterpart "Someone trained these agents to kill", agentsis the direct object. But sentences in the passive voice do nothave direct objects because the direct object from the active sentencehas been used as the subject of the passive sentence.

CJ
California
Veteran Member 39,281
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
:
There is no such thing as a transitive sentence.

Verbs are transitive or intransitive, not sentences.

"to train" is a transitive verb. As such, it can be used both in active and in passive sentences.

The sample sentence illustrates a transitive verb used in a passive sentence (i.e., a sentence in the passive voice).
In the active counterpart "Someone trained these agents to kill", agents is the direct object. But sentences in the passive voice do not have direct objects because the direct object from the active sentence has been used as the subject of the passive sentence.

CJ

I think the questioner was speaking casually when he/she used the term "transitive sentence". It's like a "present perfect sentence", a "conditional sentence", etc. We all know what is meant.

Could you tell me how you know that the sentence in question has a missing agent and not a missing object?

You: These agents are trained to kill (by...).

Other possiblities (objectless transitive): These agents are trained to kill (defectors, cockroaches, poachers, deer).
Senior Member 3,149
Hume said that if we had perfect or complete descriptive knowledge of reality, we could not, by reasoning, derive a single valid "ought".
:
Hi,

These agents are trained to kill.

I'd like to add a comment. If the sentence were 'These agents are trained to kill every year' , ie a repeated process, I would see it as more meaningful to look at this as a passive sentence. However, in the original example, I think the best way to look at it is simply that the past participle is used as an adjective describing an ongoing state. It's similar to saying 'These agents are French'.

When you look at it this way, it's clear that there is no object, or agent, involved.

Best wishes, Clive
Canada
Veteran Member 52,398
El tango argentino es un pensamiento triste que se puede bailar (The tango argentino is a sad thought which can be danced) Enrique Santos Discépolo
:


Hi,

These agents are trained to kill.

I'd like to add a comment. If the sentence were 'These agents are trained to kill every year' , ie a repeated process, I would see it as more meaningful to look at this as a passive sentence. However, in the original example, I think the best way to look at it is simply that the past participle is used as an adjective describing an ongoing state. It's similar to saying 'These agents are French'.

When you look at it this way, it's clear that there is no object, or agent, involved.

Best wishes, Clive

That of course is another way of looking at it. Like "the road was closed by the police" and "the road was closed".

So now we have three ways of looking at it:

1. A sentence containing an objectless transitive verb.

2. A passive construction.

3. A construction with an adjectival phrase, "trained to kill".
Senior Member 3,149
Hume said that if we had perfect or complete descriptive knowledge of reality, we could not, by reasoning, derive a single valid "ought".
:
Perhaps we should redefine "intransitive verb" as "a verb that must have an agent"; and "transitive verb" as "a verb that must have a patient"...

MrP
Veteran Member 12,806
...opella forensis / adducit febris...
More

Places to start

 

Community Sites

Browse Englishforums

 

Help

 

 

© MediaCet Ltd. 2012, xC v7.1.4500.21922. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive' or please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.
Views expressed in this community do not reflect the views of MediaCet LTD, and we are in no way liable for such content.
Offensive or malicious content will be removed immediately, please send an email to webmaster@mediacet.com