[title]Family quotes[/title] [description]Welcome to our family quotes section! Here you'll find some of the funniest (and wisest) quotes on the subject of family life![/description]
Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


1 2 3 4 5 6
Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Sun, Jul 16 2006 5:04 PM by Anonymous. 45 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Anonymous  +  185490 Wed, 18 Jan 06 09:48 PM

Where is the direct object in the transitive sentence below?

"These agents are trained to kill."

Clive  +  185514 Wed, 18 Jan 06 11:21 PM

Hi,

Where is the direct object in the transitive sentence below?

"These agents are trained to kill

There isn't one. It's not a transitive sentence. Consider 'The window is broken'.

best wishes, Clive

Joined on Thu, Oct 28 2004
Canada
Veteran Member 29,665
El tango argentino es un pensamiento triste que se puede bailar (The tango argentino is a sad thought which can be danced) Enrique Santos Discépolo
milky  +  185559 Thu, 19 Jan 06 01:19 AM
 Clive wrote:

Hi,

Where is the direct object in the transitive sentence below?

"These agents are trained to kill

There isn't one. It's not a transitive sentence. Consider 'The window is broken'.

best wishes, Clive

It is an objectless transitive, Clive.

Similar examples:

Eve insisted: Adam ate.

Orson Welles ate, drank and smoked too much.

Joined on Thu, Jan 15 2004
Senior Member 3,149
Hume said that if we had perfect or complete descriptive knowledge of reality, we could not, by reasoning, derive a single valid "ought".
milky  +  185565 Thu, 19 Jan 06 01:32 AM
 Anonymous wrote:

Where is the direct object in the transitive sentence below?

"These agents are trained to kill."

It's an objectless transitive.

CalifJim  +  185586 Thu, 19 Jan 06 03:10 AM
There is no such thing as a transitive sentence.

Verbs are transitive or intransitive, not sentences.

"to train" is a transitive verb.  As such, it can be used both in active and in passive sentences.

The sample sentence illustrates a transitive verb used in a passive sentence (i.e., a sentence in the passive voice).
In the active counterpart "Someone trained these agents to kill", agents is the direct object.  But sentences in the passive voice do not have direct objects because the direct object from the active sentence has been used as the subject of the passive sentence.

CJ

Joined on Mon, Aug 2 2004
California
Veteran Member 22,458
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
milky  +  185643 Thu, 19 Jan 06 08:38 AM

 CalifJim wrote:
There is no such thing as a transitive sentence.

Verbs are transitive or intransitive, not sentences.

"to train" is a transitive verb.  As such, it can be used both in active and in passive sentences.

The sample sentence illustrates a transitive verb used in a passive sentence (i.e., a sentence in the passive voice).
In the active counterpart "Someone trained these agents to kill", agents is the direct object.  But sentences in the passive voice do not have direct objects because the direct object from the active sentence has been used as the subject of the passive sentence.

CJ

I think the questioner was speaking casually when he/she used the term "transitive sentence". It's like a "present perfect sentence", a "conditional sentence", etc. We all know what is meant.

Could you tell me how you know that the sentence in question has a missing agent and not a missing object?

You: These agents are trained to kill (by...).

Other possiblities (objectless transitive): These agents are trained to kill (defectors, cockroaches, poachers, deer).

Clive  +  186061 Thu, 19 Jan 06 10:51 PM

Hi,

These agents are trained to kill.

I'd like to add a comment. If the sentence were 'These agents are trained to kill every year' , ie a repeated process, I would see it  as more meaningful to look at this as a passive sentence. However, in the original example, I think the best way to look at it is simply that the past participle is used as an adjective describing an ongoing state. It's similar to saying 'These agents are French'.

When you look at it this way, it's clear that there is no object, or agent, involved.

Best wishes, Clive

milky  +  186067 Thu, 19 Jan 06 11:23 PM
 Clive wrote:

Hi,

These agents are trained to kill.

I'd like to add a comment. If the sentence were 'These agents are trained to kill every year' , ie a repeated process, I would see it  as more meaningful to look at this as a passive sentence. However, in the original example, I think the best way to look at it is simply that the past participle is used as an adjective describing an ongoing state. It's similar to saying 'These agents are French'.

When you look at it this way, it's clear that there is no object, or agent, involved.

Best wishes, Clive

That of course is another way of looking at it. Like "the road was closed by the police" and "the road was closed".

So now we have three ways of looking at it:

1. A sentence containing an objectless transitive verb.

2. A passive construction.

3. A construction with an adjectival phrase, "trained to kill".

MrPedantic  +  186108 Fri, 20 Jan 06 01:45 AM

Perhaps we should redefine "intransitive verb" as "a verb that must have an agent"; and "transitive verb" as "a verb that must have a patient"...

MrP

Joined on Tue, Oct 12 2004
Veteran Member 12,592
...opella forensis / adducit febris...
1 2 3 4 5 6
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3616.28671. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.