[title]Family quotes[/title] [description]Welcome to our family quotes section! Here you'll find some of the funniest (and wisest) quotes on the subject of family life![/description]
Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Mon, Nov 7 2005 10:47 PM by Jussive. 2 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Anonymous  +  151456 Tue, 25 Oct 05 06:57 AM

Which are the strictly transitive verbs in English?

These have been suggested as some of them:

attain, attribute, cause, comport, delineate, depict, eclipse, impute, induce, portray, predecease, resemble, squelch, subsume, supercede, utter

Could those ever sound good if appearing without an object - or with the object as implicit?

How about abandon as a candidate for strict transitivity?

?"Where necessary, we must not merely revise, we must abandon."

"Discard"?

?*The company eventually decided to discard.

julielai  +  154345 Wed, 02 Nov 05 03:15 PM
What do you mean, anon?  Normally, I'd put an object after "discard".
Joined on Sun, Oct 24 2004
Senior Member 3,827
Just another blogger (http://hk.myblog.yahoo.com/julie-lai)
Jussive  +  156176 Mon, 07 Nov 05 10:47 PM

There are such verbs which can't take objects like 'disappear'. However, your list contains verbs that can be used both transitively and intransitively. 

Joined on Sun, Sep 25 2005
Full Member 144
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3615.39139. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.