Click here to play

Which words should I use?

1 2 3
   Share on Facebook  
Marius Hancu  #374557  Sun, 03 Jun 07 08:24 PM
was buying
  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Wed, Apr 26 2006
Montreal, Canada
Veteran Member (11,673)
Proficient Speaker
Kooyeen  #374619  Mon, 04 Jun 07 12:32 AM
 Marius Hancu wrote:
was buying


Hi,
I don't think "was buying" makes sense. I was told to avoid "the first time" + "present continuous" in any case (or in most cases, at least). I had a long chat with a native speaker, and she kept saying that sentences like "This is the first time I'm reading a novel in English" were completely unacceptable, odd and unnatural (but it seems sometimes natives use them anyway. I don't know why...)
So now I'm afraid to say something like that. Smile [:)]
  
Top 25 Contributor
Joined on Thu, Dec 22 2005
Italy
Senior Member (3,962)
Moderator
If you don't have a sense of humor already, it's about time you buy one.
Yoong Liat  #374701  Mon, 04 Jun 07 05:26 AM
 Yankee wrote:

In Kooyeen's sentence "That was the first time I bought fish there", the simple past tense is just fine.  I don't think even the most prescriptive grammarian would have a problem with that sentence.  On the contrary, without some kind of clear justification for the past perfect (such as at least adding the word 'ever'), I think a prescriptive grammarian would be more likely to have a problem with "That was the first time I had bought fish there."

I'm quoting from 'Basic English Usage' by Michael Swan.

1. We use a present perfect tense after the following experssions:
This/that/it is the first/second/third/fourth/etc.
This/that/it is the only ...
This/that/it is the best/worst/finest/most interesting/etc.
Examples:
This is the first time (that) I've heard her sing.
(NOT ... That I hear her sing.)
That's the third time you've asked me that question.
(NOT ... the third time you ask me ... )
It's the most interesting book that I've ever read.

2. When we talk about the past, we use a past perfect tense after the same expressons.
It was the third time that he had been in love that year.
(NOT ... the third time he was ... )

  
Top 25 Contributor
Joined on Mon, Sep 4 2006
Singapore
Veteran Member (5,989)
Yoong Liat
Kooyeen  #374913  Mon, 04 Jun 07 03:16 PM
 Yoong Liat wrote:

2. When we talk about the past, we use a past perfect tense after the same expressons.
It was the third time that he had been in love that year.
(NOT ... the third time he was ... )


Whoa! I missed that part (I once read the part about the present perfect in Practical English Usage, but I didn't notice the part you quoted).
I think it's another of Swan's "bad things" you can find in its gramar book. I once thought Swan's grammar was a good one, then I started to read it and I changed my mind. If I hadn't missed that part, maybe I would have changed my mind faster, LOL. Smile [:)]

Or maybe that's really true for British English... Thinking [*-)]

  
Yoong Liat  #374965  Mon, 04 Jun 07 05:08 PM
Whoa! I missed that part (I once read the part about the present perfect in Practical English Usage, but I didn't notice the part you quoted).
I think it's another of Swan's "bad things" you can find in its gramar book. I once thought Swan's grammar was a good one, then I started to read it and I changed my mind. If I hadn't missed that part, maybe I would have changed my mind faster, LOL. Smile [:)]

Or maybe that's really true for British English... Thinking [*-)]

Please note that Michael Swan and other grammarians state what I posted earlier.
  
Kooyeen  #375018  Mon, 04 Jun 07 07:10 PM
 Yoong Liat wrote:
Please note that Michael Swan and other grammarians state what I posted earlier.


When you mentioned "grammarians" and "prescribe" earlier in this thread, I thought you needed a prescriptive answer, so I said maybe the past perfect is the preferred "prescriptive" verb to choose.

But the fact is that Practical English Usage by Swan is supposed to be a descriptive grammar (see the introduction), so it's strange that he says only the past perfect is ok. And that's why I said "unless that's true for British English"... If in British English the simple past instead of the past perfect is not used, then Swan is really describing English (but only British English).

I think we need a Brit (like Nona) now, if we really want to know what's acceptable in the UK. Smile [:)]
  
Yoong Liat  #375020  Mon, 04 Jun 07 07:15 PM
Hi Kooyeen

All the grammar and English usage books I have read discuss BrE.  I've never read one on AmE because BrE is used in Singapore.

Best wishes

  
Yankee  #375043  Mon, 04 Jun 07 08:00 PM
Mother bargained with the stallholder at the market as this was the first time she was buying / had been buying / had bought fish from him.

Hi Yoong Liat

Your sentence differs from Kooyeen's sentences in that it also includes "Mother bargained".

I guess an argument can be made for both the past continuous and the past perfect (but I don't like the past perfect continuous).

You might look at 'bargaining about the price' as part of the larger/longer process of 'buying fish' that day (i.e. a shorter past activity in the middle of a longer past activity).  Here is an example of what I mean by shorter/longer past activities:
He wrote me a letter while he was vacationing in the Bahamas.


  
Top 25 Contributor
Joined on Sat, Apr 15 2006
Connecticut, USA
Senior Member (4,156)
ModeratorTeachers
Amy "You can't depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus." - Mark Twain
Marius Hancu  #375050  Mon, 04 Jun 07 08:07 PM
 Kooyeen wrote:
 Marius Hancu wrote:
was buying


Hi,
I don't think "was buying" makes sense. I was told to avoid "the first time" + "present continuous" in any case (or in most cases, at least). I had a long chat with a native speaker, and she kept saying that sentences like "This is the first time I'm reading a novel in English" were completely unacceptable, odd and unnatural (but it seems sometimes natives use them anyway. I don't know why...)

So now I'm afraid to say something like that. Smile [:)]


I asked someone to post on another site, which specializes on grammar, where Richard Firsten, a grammarian and an author (check his books at Amazon), one of the moderators of that site, was kind enough to reply it. This is his reply:
------------
I would use was buying. This was the action that was in progress at the time she bargained with the fishmonger, so the past progressive is the appropriate time to use.

Richard

http://thegrammarexchange.infopop.cc/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/340600179/m/9891047044
-------------
which to me was to be expected.

  
1 2 3
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL General English Grammar Questions
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions & Terms of Service