We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!
Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com
This question is Not Answered
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
+
150182
Fri, 21 Oct 05 10:59 AM
I know that most verbs take infinitive while some take bare infinitive, e.g.
I allow her to go. - but -
I let her go. (not to go)
Can anyone think of any reason why such irregularity exists?
Thanks.
Ricky
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pieanne
+
150201
Fri, 21 Oct 05 11:33 AM
I think here "let" is a modal auxiliary, and except for "ought to", they are followed by a bare infinitive. You'll find the same construction after "help", "make" (causative), and perhaps others, but I don't know the explanation for it, just that it's a grammar rule
Joined on
Thu, Jan 20 2005
South of France ...But I'm Belgian!
Veteran Member
7,517
I'm glad to help, but I'm not a native! And please excuse my typos...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
paco2004
+
151423
Tue, 25 Oct 05 05:42 AM
Hello Anon
"Let" is one of causative verbs that take the construct of [<verb> <sb> <do>]. "Have"and "make" belong to the same class of causative verbs. "Allow", "cause", "force", "get", and "permit" are also causative verbs, but they take the construct of [<verb> <sb> <to do>]. "Help" is also kind of causative verb and it can be used either way.
paco
[PS] Pieanne, I think we had better not to take "let" as a modal auxiliary, because we can say like "You can let your son play in the backyard".
Joined on
Wed, Nov 17 2004
Senior Member
4,095
In Japan today even dogs are learning how to bow-wow in English.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pieanne
+
151519
Tue, 25 Oct 05 11:57 AM
I see your point, Paco, thanks Yet, I don't understand "let" as "causative"... Why not say it's a transitive verb (synonym of "allow") that requires a bare infinitive? But I'm not a grammar pro...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
paco2004
+
151542
Tue, 25 Oct 05 01:19 PM
Pieanne wrote: | | Why not say it's a transitive verb (synonym of "allow") that requires a bare infinitive? But I'm not a grammar pro... |
|
True. "Let" is certainly a transitive verb that requires a bare infinitive. I myself don't know the exact definition of "causative verbs". Please give me a time to ponder about it.
paco
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rishonly
+
151666
Tue, 25 Oct 05 06:49 PM
Hi Paco2004,
In the given context, I wonder if we can say "Please give me some time.." instead of "Please give me a time".
Joined on
Sat, Mar 5 2005
KUMBAKONAM,INDIA
Contributing Member
1,782
Regards, Krishna
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
paco2004
+
151682
Tue, 25 Oct 05 08:06 PM
Hello Krish
I googled “Please give me a / some time to ..”. “Please give me a time to …” hits 137 pages and “Please give me some time to …” hits 575 pages. The pages using the former appear to be written by non-native English speakers. So maybe you are right and I was wrong. A more idiomatic expression will be “Please give me time to …”. It hits 23,000 pages. Anyway thank you for the kind comment. paco
|
|
|
|
|
Klavier,
4 yr 25 days ago
Paco2004 wrote: | "Let"
is one of causative verbs that take the construct of [<verb>
<sb> <do>]. "Have"and "make" belong to the same class of
causative verbs. "Allow", "cause", "force", "get", and "permit" are
also causative verbs, but they take the construct of
[<verb> <sb> <to do>]. "Help" is also kind of
causative verb and it can be used either way.
|
|
What about want? Is it causative too?
I want you to stay here. [verb + sb + to do]
|
|
|
|
|
|
CalifJim
+
153928
Tue, 01 Nov 05 03:58 PM
No. "want" is not causative. No matter how hard you want something, you can't thereby make it so.
One of the fancier names for verbs like "want" is "desiderative verb"!
CJ
Joined on
Mon, Aug 2 2004
California
Veteran Member
22,463
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
|
|
|
|
|
|