[title]Family quotes[/title] [description]Welcome to our family quotes section! Here you'll find some of the funniest (and wisest) quotes on the subject of family life![/description]
Learn English and meet people on the world’s largest EFL social network

We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


1 2
Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Wed, Mar 25 2009 5:28 AM by riturj. 10 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
olexbo  +  686239 Fri, 13 Mar 09 01:03 PM
Hi,

I have just read an article from The New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/02/world/europe/02ukraine.html?_r=1&scp=2&sq=ukraine&st=cse)  and come across a place where I believe the the article is more appropriate.

Across Kiev last week, people spoke of rising anger about the crisis and resentment toward a government that they said was more preoccupied with squabbling than with rallying the country.

Does the author here just want to underline some unimportance of the government or what? Should it be "toward the government" instead?

Thank you.

Best regards,
Olex
Joined on Fri, Mar 13 2009
New Member 03
AlpheccaStars  +  686242 Fri, 13 Mar 09 01:18 PM
 Olex:

Welcome to the forum!

The use of the indefinite article is correct here. "A government" means any one of a group of governments. It stresses that some governments have the behavior of rallying rather than squabbling, and other governments have the opposite behavior. They happen to have a government out of the first group. It also implies that it is the nature of their government to be that way. 

Joined on Sun, Oct 12 2008
Senior Member 3,508
The pen is mightier than the sword. Edward Bulwer-Lytton (1803-1873)
olexbo  +  686257 Fri, 13 Mar 09 01:41 PM
Thank you for the fast reply, AlpheccaStars. Now it seems I understand what the "a" implies here. In other words, it tells you the people do not like the type of government they have. Correct?
AlpheccaStars  +  686420 Fri, 13 Mar 09 10:53 PM
 Olex:

It does not go that far. It just says that the people are protesting a kind of government that squabbles rather than making progress. "Type of government" is broader, and means a form such as communism, monarchy, oligarchy, democracy, etc. Any of these types could get bogged down and not make progress. 

Avangi  +  686447 Sat, 14 Mar 09 02:20 AM
olexbo
“ I understand what the "a" implies here. In other words, it tells you the people do not like the type of government they have. Correct? ”
I'm not suggesting you do this, but when you use a "being verb," the indefinite article seems quite natural.

This is a country which squabbles.

My country is a country which squabbles.

You can praise as well as condemn.

This is a country which provides its people with safe streets and an affluent life style.

My country is a country where all citizens are treated fairly by the courts.

The people rallied to show their support for a government which has kept its promises, virtually eliminating unemployment.
Joined on Mon, Nov 19 2007
Veteran Member 8,211
". . . le plaisir delicieux et toujours nouveau d'une occupation inutile." - Henri de Regnier
CalifJim  +  686471 Sat, 14 Mar 09 05:02 AM

olexbo
... anger about the crisis and resentment toward a government that they said was more preoccupied with squabbling than with rallying the country.
It's the following restrictive relative clause that stops the author from writing the.  If he wrote ... toward the government that ... was more preoccupied with ..., he would be asking the reader to identify one particular government among many with these characteristics.  But we already know which government is being referred to.  There is no point in identifying which government it is on the basis of the description that it was preoccupied with squabbling and so on.

So this is like saying We have a government that acts in this way.
With the, it's like saying They resent the government that acts this way, but not the other governments that don't act this way.  (This doesn't make sense because the sentence is only about one government, not about identifying one of several governments that the sentence may be about.)
_____

You could do this as a non-restrictive clause with which:

... anger about the crisis and resentment toward the government, which they said was more preoccupied with ...

but it wouldn't have exactly the same meaning.

CJ
Joined on Mon, Aug 2 2004
California
Veteran Member 22,465
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
riturj  +  686479 Sat, 14 Mar 09 06:00 AM
 Olex, has written well. We use "The" before the name of author or in the group of government to show the surety. However, I have studied about article from here: http://englishlearningpractices.blogspot.com/2009/03/use-of-article-in-english-grammar.html . The author of the "Article uses" writes, "It is used for known".
Joined on Sat, Mar 14 2009
New Member 12
Yankee  +  686526 Sat, 14 Mar 09 09:49 AM
Hi Riturj

The sentence that Olex asked about was written correctly with "a".  Did you read what CalifJim wrote?

I took a look at the site you posted, and it is full of grammatical errors. Although I'm sure the author of the site is trying to help people, the explanations given are so simplistic that many, or even most of them are bound to mislead you (as has apparently happened in this case). In addition, there are so many grammatical errors on that site that you will most likely end up learning a lot of bad grammar.
I would not recommend using that site to learn good grammar.
Joined on Sat, Apr 15 2006
Connecticut, USA
Veteran Member 6,506
Amy "You can't depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus." - Mark Twain
olexbo  +  686547 Sat, 14 Mar 09 12:10 PM
Thank you for all your replies. Here I will explain what confused me.

1) I mistakenly identified  "that they said was" as a restricted relative clause, which requires "the" before "government" (which in turn comes before "that") and now I see that it is not the case.

2) I know this use of the "a" article when you "refer to a kind of, or example of something" (http://www.edufind.com/english/grammar/Determiners3.cfm):

the mouse had a tiny nose
the elephant had a long trunk
it was a very strange car

In the past I may haven't paid enough attention to the usage of "a" in the middle and before "that" as in the original sentence so  I failed to identify "toward a government that" being that case.

Now with all you help, I perceive the original sentence in the following way.

...anger about the crisis and resentment toward a government (what kind of/type of government, bad, good, etc?) that they said was more preoccupied

Thank you again.

Best regards,
Olex
1 2
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3616.28671. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.