Why Past Perfect?

1 2
   Share on Facebook  
Ant_222  #332579  Fri, 23 Feb 07 08:51 PM

Hello, everybody!

Could you please help me understand why the Past Perfect was used in the following passage?

«Under the violent Provencal sun, the elms and beeches looked exotic trees, and in the early morning, when the mists were thick, the hills _had put on_ an unearthly shape.»

Thank you in advance.

  
Top 75 Contributor
Joined on Sun, May 21 2006
Podolsk, Russia
Contributing Member (1,569)
CalifJim  #332580  Fri, 23 Feb 07 08:58 PM
The time of the first clause is presumably during the hottest part of the day (violent sun).  But the situation regarding the hills and their unearthly shape was previous to that (the early morning).

It is a strange sentence -- at least it seems so out of context.

CJ

  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Mon, Aug 2 2004
California
Veteran Member (17,568)
ModeratorProficient Speaker
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
Ant_222  #332582  Fri, 23 Feb 07 09:15 PM

Thanks you, Jim!

Here goes the whole paragraph:

«Day after day, through all that August, morning and evening were wrapped
in haze; day after day the earth shimmered in the heat, and the air was
strange, unfamiliar. As he wandered in the lanes and sauntered by the
cool sweet verge of the woods, he saw and felt that nothing was common or
accustomed, for the sunlight transfigured the meadows and changed all the
form of the earth. Under the violent Provencal sun, the elms and beeches
looked exotic trees, and in the early morning, when the mists were thick,
the hills had put on an unearthly shape.»

Maybe it'll help you to help me.

  
CalifJim  #332592  Fri, 23 Feb 07 09:50 PM
It's as I thought.  The early morning which the author refers to is earlier in time than the main time line of the narrative.  The event described in the past perfect clause occurred before the situation described just before it.

This was unfamiliar.  That was unfamiliar.  There was this difference.  There was another difference  (Elms and beeches looked exotic.).  And then there was something strange that the author had noticed earlier when such-and-such an event had occurred (The hills had looked unearthly in the mists.).

Meaning of colors:
Main story line enumerating differences, strange and unfamiliar things. 
Something unusual (hills in mists) which was noticed before the situation just described in the narrative (exotic-looking elms and beeches).


CJ

  
Ant_222  #332594  Fri, 23 Feb 07 10:05 PM

Thank you, CJ.

  
MrPedantic  #332611  Fri, 23 Feb 07 11:48 PM

...the hills had put on an unearthly shape...

This sounds a little strange to me. You can "assume a shape"; but can you "put on a shape"?

Your shape surely lies beneath the thing that is put on...

MrP

  
Top 10 Contributor
Joined on Tue, Oct 12 2004
Veteran Member (12,144)
Proficient SpeakerSystemAdministrator
...opella forensis / adducit febris...
Ant_222  #332625  Sat, 24 Feb 07 12:27 AM

Well, I perceive it this way: put on the garment of mist thus assuming a strange shape. Since the mist sort of envelops the hills, "put on" seems ok to me.

P.S.: That's from Arthur Machen's "The Hill of Dreams".

  
MrPedantic  #332628  Sat, 24 Feb 07 12:30 AM

It's interesting that you should decide to read Machen. He's not a very well known author these days (at least, not in the UK). How did you come across him, out of interest, Ant?

MrP

  
Ant_222  #332737  Sat, 24 Feb 07 02:06 PM

Nothing supernatural. I was scanning Wikipedia for info on the Hermetic tradition, met a section called "Hermetic art in popular culture and entertaniment" (usually I don't read such sections) which mentioned Lovecraft, and decided to have a look... In Lovecraft's "The Call of Cthulhu" there was a reference to Machen.

To me, Machen is harder to read than Lovecraft.

  
1 2
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL General English Grammar Questions
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions & Terms of Service