Conus Lotus  +  412534 Sat, 01 Sep 07 07:14 AM Global warming DOES exist, but it has a hell of a lot more to do with the natural cycles of the sun than it does with our puny activities. Wise up Suckers! The CFR and the UN are working for the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, the Morgans, and their like (the same mob that brought us the Communism scam). They all love to party at Bohemian Grove, dictate their policies at the Bilderburg conventions and they are elitist scum who are determined to to stamp a boot on the face of humanity, forever! Why, oh why do most people prefer the propaganda drivel that pours out of the idiot box to doing a little research? Does it comfort you to foolishly imagine that members of Skull and Bones have YOUR interests at heart? Do you even know what Skull and Bones is? Is your slogan "I have become comfortably numb"? For those who need it, here is a good swift kick up the backside! Get real! TURN THE TV OFF and start looking into these things. Are you really so dumbed-down that you don't care? Last week Aaron Russo died. Never heard of him? Well, then go do a torrent search for America-From Freedom to Fascism (Brought to you by Coca-Cola, Ford, Morgan, Big Swifty, and a host of other   and financiers - the same bunch that financed Hitler AND Vladimir Lenin) Oh, and while you are researching, check out the construction company who built most of the U.S bases in Saudi Arabia. 'Bin Laden' ringing any bells? Please, please, please turn the TV off. Please just research one or two of things I have mentioned, for the sake of your children. Conus Lotus Joined on Wed, Jan 28 2004 Heavenly Lake Namtso, Tibet Full Member 202 When the hand of the ruler is light, the people do not contrive. Constructions

	Grammar Geek  +  412685 Sat, 01 Sep 07 03:45 PM  Feathers wrote: Just for laughs -- G.W. Bush is, purportedly, trying to redefine the role of the United States from enablers to keep the peace to enablers to keep the peace from the peacekeepers, and it is his assignment. I am not a fan of Mr. Bush, but I genuinely have no idea what this means. From enablers to keep the peace to enablers to keep the peace?? Can you please explain? Grammar Geek Joined on Tue, Jan 10 2006 Veteran Member 19,650 Barbara, who answers in American English. My housekeeping skills attest to the truth of the second law of thermodynamics: Left to themselves, things get more and more random!

	MrPedantic  +  412728 Sat, 01 Sep 07 04:30 PM  Conus Lotus wrote: Global warming DOES exist [rant] ... [/rant] for the sake of your children. Calm down, Conus. When the hand of the poster is heavy, the people raise their eyebrows significantly and move on. MrP MrPedantic Joined on Tue, Oct 12 2004 Veteran Member 12,592 ...opella forensis / adducit febris...

	Conus Lotus  +  412754 Sat, 01 Sep 07 05:18 PM No no no. The direct approach is best. The brushed pigskin carpet is full, and Dinsdale will nail everyones heads to the floor if we pussyfoot around. It's better to rant than have one's head nailed to the floor (with or without a temporary dIspatch order). Conus Lotus

	Feathers  +  412786 Sat, 01 Sep 07 06:09 PM  Grammar Geek wrote:  Feathers wrote: Just for laughs -- G.W. Bush is, purportedly, trying to redefine the role of the United States from enablers to keep the peace to enablers to keep the peace from the peacekeepers, and it is his assignment. I am not a fan of Mr. Bush, but I genuinely have no idea what this means. From enablers to keep the peace to enablers to keep the peace?? Can you please explain? Hi GG, this is the way I took it -- please let me know if I'm making a grammatical mistake He is trying to redefine the role of the US... from  enablers [to keep the peace] to      enablers [to keep the peace from the peacekeepers] Feathers Joined on Thu, Jul 6 2006 Full Member 250 Grammar

	Grammar Geek  +  412788 Sat, 01 Sep 07 06:10 PM Oh, okay. Well, I can read it that way now, but what does it mean to keep the peace from the peacekeepers? Honestly, I'm not picking on you, I just don't understand what that's supposed to mean. Who are the peacekeepers these days? Grammar Geek

	Feathers  +  412795 Sat, 01 Sep 07 06:24 PM  Grammar Geek wrote: Oh, okay. Well, I can read it that way now, but what does it mean to keep the peace from the peacekeepers? Honestly, I'm not picking on you, I just don't understand what that's supposed to mean. Who are the peacekeepers these days? GG, it seems that I hurt you.  You know, it was not my initial intention to add another Bushism here on this site: what I really wanted to say is -- I repeat -- in Japan we say, the more intelligent one considers oneself to be, the more he tends to criticize American foreign policy.  Have a great holiday! Feathers Grammar

	Dew 2007  +  412813 Sat, 01 Sep 07 07:10 PM I think we just came up to another biggest problem - the problem of mutual understanding. If people could understand each other easily - many of problems would not exist. Dew 2007 Joined on Sun, Jun 17 2007 Russia Contributing Member 1,352 Keep wondering!

	MrPedantic  +  412865 Sat, 01 Sep 07 11:00 PM  Conus Lotus wrote: No no no. The direct approach is best. The brushed pigskin carpet is full, and Dinsdale will nail everyones heads to the floor if we pussyfoot around. It's better to rant than have one's head nailed to the floor (with or without a temporary dIspatch order). That's more like it. Now you're talking my kind of language. I well remember Kipling Road. We were in and out of each other's fridges all day long. Those were cheery days. Violent but cheery. MrP MrPedantic