Click here to play

When to use would and when to use could

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
   Share on Facebook  
Stannum  #159877  Fri, 18 Nov 05 05:52 AM
 Anonymous wrote:

Which sentence is correct:

 

1. I would be grateful if you could provide me with the balance sheet for Mourant CDO by close of business tommorrow.

2. I would be grateful if you would provide me with the balance sheet for Moraunt CDO by close of business tommorrow.

both are correct but the first sounds better because of the lack of repetition

robert

  
Top 150 Contributor
Joined on Fri, Oct 28 2005
Melbourne Australia
Regular Member (526)
Forbes  #160004  Fri, 18 Nov 05 01:23 PM

It is virtually impossible to lay down rules about the use of modal verbs in English in a forum such as this.

The following sentences give an example of how tricky it can be:

I am so hungry I could eat a horse.

There was a time I could eat a horse, but now I can only manage a goat.

It is a question of taking each case you come across it and asking what it means. Like a lot if things it will gradually fall into place.

  
Top 100 Contributor
Joined on Thu, Jun 16 2005
Regular Member (834)
Proficient Speaker
Anonymous  #167809  Thu, 08 Dec 05 10:00 PM
Alright, so modals are not inflected... That should mean they are non finite. How come they do not work in nonfinte contexts such as infinitive clauses then?

If you argue that the form of the verb is what marks an inflection, how do you explain that put is the past form of put? No inflection there either, yet we know there is a difference.

Laure

 (I am interested in that tense and modal debate, so I just thought I'd ask)

  
Anonymous  #341965  Thu, 22 Mar 07 08:14 AM

I would't do this work.

  
Forbes  #342807  Sat, 24 Mar 07 11:45 AM
 Anonymous wrote:

Which sentence is correct:

1. I would be grateful if you could provide me with the balance sheet for Mourant CDO by close of business tommorrow.

2. I would be grateful if you would provide me with the balance sheet for Moraunt CDO by close of business tommorrow.

When I started in the law some 40 odd years ago I was told that the correct form (at least for a lawyer when writing) was:

I should be grateful if you would...

or (but not quite so refined)

We shall be grateful if you will...

The first always struck me as suggesting:

I ought to be grateful...

Native English speakers argue fiercely about the correct usage of modal verbs. It is futile for learners of English to try and find rules for every situation.

  
milky  #343169  Sun, 25 Mar 07 11:25 AM

<When I started in the law some 40 odd years ago I was told that the correct form (at least for a lawyer when writing) was:>

Why "in the law" there? Why not just "in law"?

  
Top 50 Contributor
Joined on Thu, Jan 15 2004
Senior Member (3,149)
Hume said that if we had perfect or complete descriptive knowledge of reality, we could not, by reasoning, derive a single valid "ought".
Forbes  #343413  Sun, 25 Mar 07 09:44 PM

 Milky wrote:
Why "in the law" there? Why not just "in law"?

"In the law" sounds right to me - it's what I always say.

One says: I work in the arts, but I work in medicine.

No idea why.

  
milky  #343564  Mon, 26 Mar 07 08:24 AM
Sounds like you are a cop.
  
milky  #343566  Mon, 26 Mar 07 08:28 AM

Interesting:

Results 1 - 100 of about 129,000 for "work in law

Results 1 - 100 of about 24,900 for "work in the law".

  
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
AddThis Feed Button RSS Feed: ESL Linguistics Discussion Forum
© 2008 MediaCET Ltd.
Terms and Conditions & Terms of Service