If you read carefully, you will see that I simply echoed what you had
already said, for the most part. That's why I posted "In addition
to ...", not "In disagreement with ...".
I don't see how you can object to this
| Without the will the statement is more neutral with respect to such implied predictions. |
|
unless you feel that the statements with
will (
... will come home ...) and without
will (
... comes home ...)
are equivalent with respect to implied predictions. But that's
not what you claimed earlier. Your mention that there is a
difference coincides with my mention that there is a difference.
We're just quibbling about how big a difference it is.
CJ