Englishuser  +  265558 Mon, 11 Sep 06 06:54 PM Yes, J. Baker, but the distillation process is unnecessarily clumsy, isn't it? Besides, it wouldn't solve problems such as starvation and war, nor would it help us with environmental concerns. Englishuser Joined on Thu, Mar 30 2006 Regular Member 717

	J. Baker  +  265615 Mon, 11 Sep 06 09:15 PM And how u going to solve it. the population has to be together and fight against it. not Fight like doing a war but fight against the goverment. J. Baker

	Englishuser  +  265937 Tue, 12 Sep 06 02:46 PM Hi J. Baker, My solution is simple and efficient. People should not be encouraged to have children. This way the population of the world will decrease. Of course some people should have children still, but not all people, and no one should be allowed to have more than one child. Englishuser

	Twister  +  266070 Tue, 12 Sep 06 07:20 PM Hi every body , I've read your posts . I was thinking about the solutions you've offered to the under debate  problem. We all know that the population of Earth is still growing more than ever before . And we also know that the environmental pollution is growing more than ever before too. Now,if we supposed that we could limit the population, another question would arise . **How could we STOP the pollution process that is ruining the rest of the fresh water we have ??????** The above mentioned words are to convince you that limiting the population is not good enough to take as a solo solution.      And now let's talk   about using the water of oceans instead of fresh water as a new source for water . I think ,as a chemist, the water of oceans can be used for washing purposes only, and  this water would not be as healthy as pure water to drink .   I am  waiting hopefully for you to answer some of the questions I wrote in the previous post.     By the way, I wish you correct any grammatically mistake in my posts. Twister Joined on Mon, Aug 28 2006 New Member 19 IF YOU WANT TO EARN ,YOU HAVE TO LEARN