We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Sat, Jan 20 2007 7:10 AM by CalifJim. 2 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Anonymous  +  317473 Sat, 20 Jan 07 02:45 AM

Hi there,

I am a non-native English teacher. I want to explain to my students the reasons behind the difference in pronouncing 'write' and 'written' is that 'written' has double Ts. How can I tell them about this?

Second question: I want to tell students the correct of pronunciation of 'Donald'. It should not be pronounced as 'Do-nald'. It should be spoken as 'Don-nald' because 'n' is shared by the two vowels 'o' and 'a'. So how can I explain this in correct written and spoken English?

Newcomer

Marvin A.  +  317494 Sat, 20 Jan 07 04:22 AM
I want to explain to my students the reasons behind the difference in pronouncing 'write' and 'written' is that 'written' has double Ts. How can I tell them about this?

Whether it's written with 2 t's or 3 t's or no t's has absolutely nothing to do with why it's pronounced like that.  And to properly explain the reason for that you'd have to go all the way back to Old English.  As usual, there are no real rules for pronouncing English based on the orthography, but in general a vowel followed by a double consonant tends to be lax.


Second question: I want to tell students the correct of pronunciation of 'Donald'. It should not be pronounced as 'Do-nald'. It should be spoken as 'Don-nald' because 'n' is shared by the two vowels 'o' and 'a'. So how can I explain this in correct written and spoken English?


It certainly should not be pronounced "Don-nald".  It's pronounced [ dAnold ] .  Spelling has little to do with how English is pronounced.  It could be written "Donnnald", and that would not change how it's pronounced--nor determine how it should be pronounced.
Joined on Fri, Dec 8 2006
Regular Member 638
CalifJim  +  317521 Sat, 20 Jan 07 07:10 AM
It seems to me that you are wrestling with the "Second-Letter Rule", which says that a single vowel letter (i.e., not combined with another vowel letter in a digraph) is pronounced tense if the second letter after it is another vowel letter, lax otherwise.  (lady, caddie, hope, hop, hoping, hopping, June, junk, bite, bit, bitty, bitten, ...)   Unfortunately, this rule has only limited application, typically in one-syllable words and in final stressed syllables of polysyllabic words.  And the rule never works when v is involved because v is virtually never doubled.  (*livved! *givven! *devvil!)  Several other cases also conspire to make the rule less than universal.

The Second-Letter Rule works for write and written, but not for Donald.  You're correct that for the spelling to match the pronunciation in a system where the Second-Letter Rule always works, Donald would have to be spelled *Donnald.

I suggest that you introduce a phonetic spelling system to your students to illustrate how words are pronounced.  You may want to point out some common correspondences between the spelling and the pronunciation, all the while warning your students that these correspondences cannot always be relied on, and often the pronunciation of a word simply must be memorized separately from the spelling. Sad [:(]

CJ



Joined on Mon, Aug 2 2004
California
Veteran Member 22,415
"There are no facts, only interpretations" - Nietzsche
© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3615.29165. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.