We have partnered with TradePub to bring you free industry magazines and resources - no coupons or credit cards required!

Visit: englishforums.tradepub.com


Share this topic:
This question is Not Answered
Latest post Tue, May 5 2009 12:41 PM by Avangi. 6 replies.
Suggest an answer | | |
Snappy  +  716474 Tue, 05 May 09 11:50 AM
In my understanding, we can use "...years/days/hours later" in the past tense.

Example: He left his family but returned home three years later.

Is it possible to use it in the future tense?
Can I say, for example, "I will go there three days later"?

Joined on Tue, Mar 24 2009
Kobe, Japan
Full Member 209
Avangi  +  716509 Tue, 05 May 09 12:22 PM
Three days later than what?


The form will work if you make it similar to your past tense example.  You're comparing one event to another.  You compared one past tense event to another past tense event.


Do the same thing with your future tense example.


I plan to be in Boston next Thursday, and I will go to New York three days later.


It doesn't work when you mean "later than now."


You can say, "Don't worry.  I'll be there later."  True, that means later than now.


But "I'll be there three days later" needs a future reference time.

Joined on Mon, Nov 19 2007
Veteran Member 8,172
". . . le plaisir delicieux et toujours nouveau d'une occupation inutile." - Henri de Regnier
Cool Breeze  +  716510 Tue, 05 May 09 12:25 PM
You can say: I will go there in three days.


CB

Joined on Fri, Apr 7 2006
Senior Member 3,970
"I hope you'll all live to be 150 years old - and the last voice you hear is mine!" Frank Sinatra on stage in Oslo, Norway, 28 September 1991
Snappy  +  716512 Tue, 05 May 09 12:30 PM
Avangi
“Three days later than what?


The form will work if you make it similar to your past tense example.  You're comparing one event to another.  You compared one past tense event to another past tense event.


Do the same thing with your future tense example.


I plan to be in Boston next Thursday, and I will go to New York three days later.


It doesn't work when you mean "later than now."


You can say, "Don't worry.  I'll be there later."  True, that means later than now.


But "I'll be there three days later" needs a future reference time.



I forgot to add an important factor.
A grammar book published in Japan said that we can't use "three days later" to mean "in three days' time from now."

Is the following usage acceptable?

A: He is on another phone. Could you wait?
B: I'll call him ten minutes later.

Avangi  +  716518 Tue, 05 May 09 12:34 PM
Absolutely not!  You can say, "I'll call you a little bit later."


Does your grammar book offer an example?

Snappy  +  716528 Tue, 05 May 09 12:39 PM
Is "I'll call him in ten minutes" acceptable?


According to the grammar book, "I'll call him ten minutes later" is wrong.

It should be "I'll call him in ten minutes."

Avangi  +  716529 Tue, 05 May 09 12:41 PM
Correct.


I know it seems crazy.


I believe you could say, "A little while ago it was exactly three o'clock.  I'll call you three hours later than that."  It would be an impractical thing to say, but I think it would be correct.


It's now twelve o'clock. I'll call you two hours later than that.  "Than that" is necessary here.


I think it's correct, but no one in his right mind would say it.

© MediaCet Ltd. 2009, v5.0.3607.32596. All content posted by our users is a contribution to the public domain, this does not include imported usenet posts.*
For web related enquires please contact us on webmaster@mediacet.com, status updates are available at status.mediacet.com.
*Usenet post removal: Use 'X-No-Archive'. You may not have understood that your posts would end up in the public domain. Please send proof of the poster's email, we will remove immediately.