Clive wrote: |
Hi again,
I'm waiting for Clive's reply or I got your reply. I'm waiting for Clive's. Sure, that's the normal way of speaking.
I'm waiting for the reply of Clive Also OK, but rather more formal.
He's not your teacher, he's our. No, it's not grammatical.
.... he's ours. Fine. Must be a good teacher, if two classes are fighting over him!
How about if I say the same to a blonde bombshell wearing a deep V-neck top over a ruffled skirt ?? Well, much depends on: A. Your gender. B. The bombshell's gender. C. Whether the bombshell is attracted to people on the basis of their grammar.
Best wishes, Clive
|
|
Interesting grammatical aspect that you made me aware of, Thanks.
So, based on that logic, I presume it would be perfectly acceptable saying "can I see a snap of you" ???
My gender would be the member of physically sturdy sex (course, with
few exceptions, since I was told women could go WILDER THAN A WILD
BEAST, in certain situation, at certain location & with certain
individual
![Wink [;)]](/emoticons/emotion-5.gif)
& the bombshell's gender, I would be looking for
would be any member of opposite sex.
![Big Smile [:D]](/emoticons/emotion-2.gif)
who's up for fun (not
necessarily in a sexual sense, though